LandCode
FayettevilleUnified Development Ordinance (UDO)

Chapter 100 — Administrative Provisions

current as of 2026-03-05currency checked manuallyOfficialofficial source33 sections · full chapter
§ 101.1

Title.

Sec. 101.1. Title.

This document, in its entirety, shall be known and cited as the “Unified Development Ordinance of the City of Fayetteville, Georgia” and may be referred to as the “UDO”. This UDO consists of the following chapters:

CHAPTER 100 Establishes and implements regulations generally applicable to Administrative the City of Fayetteville and specifically addresses administrative Provisions regulations, enforcement and penalties applicable to Chapters 300, 400 and 500 CHAPTER 200 Serves as the City of Fayetteville Zoning Ordinance and Zoning and Land Use constitutes a zoning ordinance within the meaning of Georgia Law CHAPTER 300 Regulates land development in the City of Fayetteville Land Development CHAPTER 400 Regulates site development in the City of Fayetteville Site Development CHAPTER 500 Regulates building and construction activities in the City of Building and Fayetteville Construction APPENDIX A | B A - Provides for definitions used within Chapters 100, 200, 300, Definitions | 400 and 500 History Table B - Provides for summary of amendments to this UDO Chapters 100, 300, 400 and 500 are not intended to constitute a zoning ordinance or zoning regulations.

§ 101.2

Legal provisions.

Sec. 101.2. Legal provisions.

A.Enactment clause.

This Unified Development Ordinance is enacted by the Mayor and City Council to promote the public health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity, comfort, and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants, residents, businesses and visitors of the City of Fayetteville, Georgia, and is intended to achieve the following purposes:

1.To promote desirable living conditions and the sustained stability of neighborhoods;
2.To protect property against blight and depreciation;
3.To secure economy in government expenditures;
4.To lessen congestion in the streets;
5.To secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers;
6.To provide adequate light and air;
7.To prevent the overcrowding of land;
8.To avoid undue concentration of population;
9.To facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements;
10.To protect the value of existing properties;
11.To reduce the negative impact of mass retailers by promoting the most appropriate use of land, buildings, and structures throughout the city;
12.To implement the vision, goals, and policies of the City of Fayetteville Comprehensive Plan, and
13.To repeal conflicting ordinances and resolutions, and other matters.
B.Authority.

The Mayor and City Council are authorized to adopt this UDO under the authority of Article 9, Section 2, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Constitution of the State of Georgia, the Charter of the City of Fayetteville, and pursuant to the enabling authority as set forth within the Georgia Zoning Procedures Law (O.C.G.A. § 36-66-1, et. seq.) and other laws enacted by the General Assembly.

C.Applicability.

All development and redevelopment shall comply with the standards, criteria and procedures of this UDO.

Development or redevelopment may not occur without official authorization pursuant to the processes and procedures of this UDO.

1.Applicability to property.

The provisions of this UDO applies to all land within the City of Fayetteville, Georgia. The application of regulations in this UDO to specific parcels of land is governed by the official zoning map which is incorporated and adopted herein by reference.

2.Compliance with UDO.

Land may not be used, divided, or subdivided, and structures may not be constructed, enlarged, altered or occupied except in compliance with the provisions of this UDO.

3.Conflicting regulations.
a.Validity of ordinances.

Whenever reference is made to a resolution, ordinance, statute, regulation, or document, it shall be construed as a reference to the most recent edition of such regulation, resolution, ordinance, statute, regulation, or document, unless otherwise specifically stated.

b.Control over less restrictive laws and regulations.

If any condition or requirement imposed by this UDO is more restrictive than a condition or requirement imposed by any other law, rule or regulation of any kind, the more restrictive condition or requirement shall apply.

c.Control over less restrictive private agreements.

This UDO does not nullify any private agreement or covenant. However, where the UDO is more restrictive than a private agreement or covenant, the UDO shall control. The city does not and shall not enforce any private agreement or covenant.

§ 101.3

Severability clause.

Sec. 101.3 Severability clause.

If any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, sentence or provision of these regulations shall be judged to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall not affect, impair, invalidate or nullify any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, sentence or provision of these regulations which remain in full force and effect as if such portion so adjudged invalid were not originally part of the UDO.

§ 101.4

Interpretation.

Sec. 101.4. Interpretation.

A.Intent.

In the interpretation and application of this UDO, all provisions shall be held to be minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, morals, safety, comfort, convenience, or general welfare. This UDO is not intended to repeal, abrogate, annul, or in any way to impair or interfere with any existing provision of law or ordinance other than this UDO, or with any rules, regulation or permits previously adopted or issued or which shall be adopted or issued pursuant to the law relating to the use of buildings or premises, provided, however, that where this UDO imposes a greater restriction than is required by any existing ordinance or by rules, regulations or permits, the provisions of this UDO shall control.

Nothing in this UDO should be interpreted or construed to give rise to any permanent vested rights in the continuation of any particular use, district, zoning classification or any permissible activities therein; and they are hereby declared to be subject to subsequent amendment, change or modification as may be necessary to the preservation or protection of public health, safety, morals and general welfare.

B.Rules applying to text.

Within this UDO, certain rules of construction apply to the text as follows unless the context of a word or phrase clearly indicates contrary:

1.The term “building” includes the term “structure”
2.The term “erected” includes the terms “constructed”, “moved”, “located” and “relocated”.
3.The term “lot” includes the term “tract”, “plot” or “parcel”.
4.The term “map” or “zoning map” means the official zoning map of the city.
5.The term “person” includes the terms “individuals”, “firms”, “partnerships”, “corporations”, “associations”,
6.“governmental bodies”, and all other legal entities.
7.The term “used” and “occupied” include the terms “intended, arranged or designed to be used or occupied.”
8.The word “shall” is always mandatory and is never discretionary.
9.The word “may” is permissive.
C.Rules of construction.

The words, terms and phrases used in this UDO shall have the meaning assigned to them in Appendix A –Definitions, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning.

The following rules shall apply for construing or interpreting the terms and provisions of the UDO:

1.Meanings and intent.

All provisions, terms, phrases, and expressions herein shall be construed according to the purpose statements set forth throughout this UDO. When a specific section of this UDO gives a different meaning than the general definition provided herein, the specific section’s meaning and application of the term shall control.

2.Technical and non-technical terms.

Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases that may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law shall be construed and understood according to such meaning.

3.Conjunctions.

Unless the context clearly suggests the contrary, conjunctions shall be interpreted as follows:

a.“And” indicates that all connected items, conditions, provisions or events apply; and,
b.“Or” indicates that one or more of the connected items, conditions, provisions or events apply.
4.Tenses, plurals and gender.

Words used in the present tense include the future tense. Words used in the singular number include the plural number and the plural number includes the singular number, unless the context of the particular usage clearly indicates otherwise. Words used in the masculine gender include the feminine gender, and vice versa.

5.Text and graphics.

Illustration, photographs and graphics are included within this UDO to illustrate the intent and requirement of the text. In the case of a conflict between the text of this UDO and any illustration, photograph or graphics, the text shall govern.

6.Lists and examples.

Unless otherwise specifically indicated, lists of items or examples that use terms “for example,”

“including,” and “such as,” or similar language are intended to provide examples and are not exhaustive lists of all possibilities.

7.Computation of time.

The time in which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first business day and including the last business day. If a deadline or required date of action falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday observed by the city, the deadline or required date of action shall be the next business day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday observed by the city. References to days are business days unless otherwise stated.

8.Delegation of authority.

Any act authorized by this UDO shall be carried out by the City Manager, Director of Community and Economic Development Department, City Engineer, Building Official, Fire Marshal, Director of Public Services, or their respective designee.

9.Public officials and agencies.

All public officials, bodies and agencies to which references are made are those of the City of Fayetteville, Georgia, unless otherwise indicated.

10.Measuring distance.

Unless specified otherwise, in those provisions that require separation between uses or properties, measurement of distance shall be from nearest property line to nearest property line.

§ 101.5

Relationship to comprehensive plan.

Sec. 101.5. Relationship to comprehensive plan.

A.Role of comprehensive plan.

The City of Fayetteville Comprehensive Plan, consisting of its Future Land Use Map and related policies, as may be amended from time to time, is hereby established as the official policy of the city concerning designated future land uses, and as a guide to decisions regarding the appropriate manner in which property may be zoned in the incorporated areas of the city. A copy of the comprehensive plan, as may be amended from time to time, shall be maintained at the Community and Economic Development Department and be available for inspection by the public.

B.Relationship between comprehensive plan and zoning.

The comprehensive plan does not change the existing zoning districts in the city and does not itself permit or prohibit any existing or future land uses. Instead, the comprehensive plan establishes broad planning policy for current and future land uses and will be consulted as a guideline for making decisions about applications to amend the official zoning map and text of this UDO. An approval of an amendment to the comprehensive plan from the Mayor and City Council shall not have any impact on a rezoning request.

C.Consistency with comprehensive plan character areas.

Any applicant seeking to rezone property to a classification that is inconsistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and/or the future land use map must first obtain approval of an amendment to the comprehensive plan from the Mayor and City Council following the procedures in this UDO.

D.Amendments to the comprehensive plan.

The comprehensive plan shall be reviewed and updated or amended (as appropriate) according to a schedule approved by the Mayor and City Council, and as required by the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in compliance with the Rules of DCA, Chapter 110-12-1, Minimum Standards and Procedures for Local Comprehensive Planning. Exceptions may be granted by the Mayor and City Council in between the regular review and update cycle in cases of demonstrated hardship, or in cases of large-scale developments that may provide special economic benefits to the community. Requests for exceptions shall be subject to approval by the Mayor and City Council during a regular meeting.

§ 101.6

Fees.

Sec. 101.6. Fees.

A.Fees for permits and other approvals required under this UDO shall be established from time to time by resolution of the Mayor and City Council.
B.Application and plan review fees shall be submitted with the application, and upon acceptance of said submission for review and consideration, shall not be refundable. Failure to pay a required application fee shall cause the application to be returned to the applicant without acceptance for review or consideration by the city.
C.Permit fees, if any, shall be submitted as a prerequisite to issuance of the permit.
D.Prior to approval of a final plat or certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall pay to the city such fees and performance and maintenance bonds as shall be required by this UDO and/or established by the Mayor and City Council.
§ 101.7

Adoption of certain codes.

Sec. 101.7. Adoption of certain codes.

A.Adoption of technical building and construction codes.

It is the intent of the city to enforce the latest editions of the following state minimum standard codes, as adopted and amended by the Georgia Department of Community Affairs, including:

1.International Building Code (IBC).
2.International Residential Code (IRC).
3.International Fire Code (IFC).
4.International Plumbing Cod (IPC).
5.International Mechanical Code (IMC).
6.International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC).
7.National Electrical Code (NEC).
8.International Energy Conservation Code (IECG).
9.International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPC).
10.International Existing Building Code (IEBC).
11.International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC).

The codes identified above mean such codes as they are currently adopted by DCA, provided that any such code may hereafter be amended or revised as provided in § O.C.G.A. 8-2-3(a).

B.Georgia accessibility code compliance.

In addition to the regulations of the UDO, the Georgia Accessibility Code for buildings and facilities shall also apply. In the case of conflict between the UDO and the Georgia Accessibility Code, the more stringent provisions will govern.

C.Life Safety Code.

In addition to the regulations of the UDO, the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101) for buildings and facilities shall also apply. In the case of conflict between the UDO and the Life Safety Code, the more stringent provisions will govern.

§ 101.8

Repeal of ordinances.

Sec. 101.8. Repeal of ordinances.

A.Repeal.

The repeal of any language within the previously approved City of Fayetteville ordinances, or any expiration by virtue of any provision contained within said ordinances, shall not affect any right accrued, any offense committed, any penalty or punishment incurred or any proceeding commenced before the repeal took effect or the regulation expired.

B.The adoption of this UDO shall have the effect of repealing and replacing the following previously adopted City of Fayetteville Code of Ordinances in relevant part:
1.Chapter 2. - Advertising and Signs.
2.Chapter 18. - Buildings.
3.Chapter 42. - Environment.
4.Chapter 74. - Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places.
5.Chapter 78. - Subdivisions.
6.Chapter 94. - Zoning.
C.Amendments.

When any language which repealed another shall itself be repealed, the previous language shall not be revived without being approved as a text amendment to this UDO.

§ 101.9

Enactment and effective date.

Sec. 101.9. Enactment and effective date.

In accordance with the authority granted by the Constitution of the State of Georgia as enacted by the Georgia General Assembly and Ratified by General Election, the Mayor and City Council of Fayetteville, Georgia, hereby ordains and enacts into law on May 4, 2023 this Unified Development Ordinance of the City of Fayetteville, Georgia.

§ 101.10

Official zoning map.

Sec. 101.10. Official zoning map.

So enacted into law is the “Official Zoning Map of Fayetteville, Georgia” as amended to reflect the zoning districts adopted as a part of this UDO.

ARTICLE 2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

§ 102.1

General responsibility.

Sec. 102.1. General responsibility.

The provisions of this article shall be administered and enforced by the Mayor and City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, UDO Administrators, Community and Economic Development Department, Technical Review Committee and/or their respective designees.

A.Mayor and City Council.

The Mayor and City Council are the legislative body of the city and, by law, are responsible for adopting and amending this UDO, including the Official Zoning Map and Future Land Use Map. In addition, the Mayor and City Council have the following responsibilities related to the administration and enforcement of this UDO:

1.Establish a schedule of fees, charges, and expenses and a collection procedure for building permits, certificates of occupancy, appeals, and other matters pertaining to this UDO;
2.Appoint UDO Administrators;
3.Appoint members of boards, committees, and commissions;
4.Approve annexation of new lands into the city; and,
5.Review and act upon all other requests, as specified by this article.
B.Planning and Zoning Commission.

In order to protect the public health, safety, morals, convenience, prosperity and general welfare, as well as to promote efficiency an economy in the development of the city, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the power and duty to:

1.Prepare a comprehensive plan or parts thereof for the development of the city;
2.Prepare and recommend for adoption to the Mayor and City Council a zoning ordinance and zoning map for the city;
3.Prepare and recommend for adoption to the Mayor and City Council regulations for the subdivision of land within the city, and to administer the regulations as applicable;
4.Prepare and recommend for adoption to the Mayor and City Council a plat or plats or an official map showing the exact location of the boundary lines of existing, proposed, extended, widened or narrowed streets, public open spaces or public building sites, together with regulations to control the erection of buildings or other structures within such lines, within the city or a specified portion thereof;
5.Review and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding the annexation and zoning classification of lands proposed for annexation into the city;
6.Review all applications for text and map amendments and all recommendations for text and map amendments referred to it by the Mayor and City Council and make recommendations thereupon to the Mayor and City Council; and,
7.Review and act upon all requests, as specified by this article, including, but not limited to, certain site development plan reviews.
A.UDO Administrators and their authority.
1.Director of Community and Economic Development.

The Director of Community and Economic Development is established as the head of the Community and Economic Development Department and has those powers and duties as expressly identified in this article and the Code of Ordinances. Though the Director of Community and Economic Development may designate UDO review and approval authority to other responsible persons in the Community and Economic Development Department, he or she remains responsible for the actions taken by the designee. The Director of Community and Economic Development shall oversee all administrative duties related to this article, except as where another official or body is specified.

2.City Engineer.

In conjunction with the Director of Public Services, the City Engineer serves as the primary administrator of Chapters 300 and 400 of the UDO and has primary review authority over the articles in those chapters.

3.Director of Public Services.

In conjunction with the City Engineer, the Director of Public Services serves as the primary administrator of Chapters 300 and 400 of the UDO and has primary review authority over the articles in those chapters.

4.Building Official.

The Building Official serves as the primary administrator of Chapter 500 of the UDO and has the primary review authority over the articles in that chapter.

5.Fire Marshal.

The Fire Marshal serves as the primary administrator of Chapter 500 of the UDO and has the primary review authority over the articles in that chapter.

6.Community and Economic Development Department.

The Community and Economic Development Department consists of the Planning and Zoning, Building, Engineering and Code Enforcement divisions and is responsible for administering and enforcing the provisions of this article and shall, among other duties, issue all permits and notices of violations provided for herein.

In addition to the authority and duties that may be conferred by general law and the Code of Ordinances, the Community and Economic Development Department shall have the following powers and duties under this article:

a.To examine and approve applications pertaining to the use of land, buildings, or structures when the applications conform with the provisions of the UDO;
b.To authorize issuance by the city of all building permits and certificates of occupancy, and keeping permanent records of those permits;
c.To inspect buildings, structures and uses of land as are necessary to determine compliance with the provisions of the UDO;
d.To maintain permanent and current records of this UDO including maps and amendments;
e.To enforce the provisions of this UDO;
f.To review and decide applications for temporary use permits;
g.To review and decide applications for sign permits;
h.To render interpretations of this UDO;
i.To establish application content requirements and a submission schedule for review of applications and appeals;
j.To review and making recommendations through staff reports to the Mayor and City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and other boards and agencies as necessary on applications for permits and other approvals, where appropriate, and taking any other action necessary to administer the provisions of this UDO; and,
k.To maintain the Official Zoning Map and other records and official materials that relate to the adoption, amendment, enforcement, or administration of this UDO.
7.Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee (TRC) shall be a staff committee comprised of representatives from Planning and Zoning, Engineering, Building, Public Works, Fire and Police, and/or other departments as needed. The purpose of the TRC is to meet with applicants and/or their consultants to review and provide initial feedback for all conceptual site plans, development plans, preliminary plats, construction drawings, final plats, and building construction plans.

ARTICLE 3. ADMINISTRATION.

§ 103.1

Procedures for administration.

Sec. 103.1. Procedures for administration.

It shall be unlawful for any person to commence excavation for or construction of any building or structure or moving of any existing building or structure without first obtaining a permit from the UDO Administrator. No permit shall be issued for the construction, moving, placement or alteration of any building or structure until proper approval has been granted and fees have been submitted in accordance with the provisions of this article.

§ 103.2

Minimum requirements.

Sec. 103.2. Minimum requirements.

In the interpretation and application of this article, all provisions shall be held to be minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, morals, safety, comfort, convenience, or general welfare. It is not intended by this article to repeal, abrogate, annul, or in any way to impair or interfere with any existing provision of law or ordinance other than this UDO; or with any rules, regulation or permits previously adopted or issued or which shall be adopted or issued pursuant to the law relating to the use of buildings or premises;

provided, that where this article imposes a greater restriction than is required by any existing ordinance or by rules, regulations or permits, the provisions of this article shall control. Nothing in this article should be interpreted or construed to give rise to any permanent vested rights in the continuation of any particular use, district, zoning classification or any permissible activities therein; and they are hereby declared to be subject to subsequent amendment, change or modification as may be necessary to the preservation or protection of public health, safety, morals and general welfare.

§ 103.3

Enforcement.

Sec. 103.3. Enforcement.

A.Enforcement authority.

It shall be the duty of the Code Enforcement Officer to enforce the provisions of this UDO under the advisement of the UDO Administrator.

B.Public nuisance.

Any building or structure which is erected, repaired, altered, or converted, or any use of premises or land which is begun or changed subsequent to the time of passage and in violation of any of the provisions of this article is hereby declared to be a public nuisance per se, and may be abated by order of any court of competent jurisdiction.

A.Notice of Violation (NOV).

If the UDO Administrator determines that an applicant or other responsible person has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of a permit or has failed to comply with any of the provisions of this UDO, a written notice of violation shall be served to the applicant or other responsible person. Where a person is engaged in activity covered by this UDO without having first secured a permit for that activity, the notice of violation will be served on the owner or the responsible person in charge of the activity being conducted on the site.

The notice of violation shall contain:
1.The name and address of the owner or the applicant or the responsible person;
2.The address or other description of the site upon which the violation is occurring;
3.A statement specifying the nature of the violation;
4.A description of the remedial measures necessary to bring the action or inaction into compliance with the permit, or with the provisions of this UDO, and the date for the completion of such remedial action;
5.A statement of the penalty or penalties that may be assessed against the person to whom the notice of violation is directed; and
6.A statement that the determination of violation may be appealed to the city by filing a written notice of appeal within 30 days after the notice of violation (except that in the event the violation constitutes an immediate danger to public health or public safety, 24 hours’ notice will be sufficient).
E.Violation.
1.Any action or inaction that violates the provisions of this UDO or violates any permit issued subject to this UDO may be cause for enforcement action.
2.No building or other structure shall be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered without a building permit issued by the city.
3.No building permit shall be issued except in conformance with the provisions of this chapter and the provisions set out under this UDO.
E.Certificate of Occupancy (CO) required.
1.A certificate of occupancy issued by the Building Official is required in advance of the use or occupancy of:
2.Any lot or a change in the use thereof; and
3.A building hereafter erected or a change in the use of an existing building.
4.No certificate of occupancy shall be issued unless the lot or building or structure complies with all the provisions of this UDO.
5.A record of all certificates of occupancy shall be kept on file in the office of the Building Official and a copy shall be furnished, on request, to any person having a proprietary or tenancy interest in the building or land involved.
§ 103.4

Penalties for violation.

Sec. 103.4. Penalties for violation.

Any building or structure that is erected, altered, converted, or maintained in violation of this article shall be subject up to the maximum fine as authorized by the city’s charter. Continuance of a violation shall be considered a separate and distinct offense for each day the violation is continued. Furthermore, any structure that is in violation of this article is not eligible for petition for a variance or other zoning action and will be subject to fines until the structure is brought into compliance with this article.

Where a violation of this UDO exists with respect to the use of any building, structure, or land, the city may employ the following remedies and penalties:

A.Citation.

If the violation is by a tenant, person, corporation, firm or other entity who is not the owner of record of the building, structure or land, the city may issue a citation for the violation of the UDO to that person or entity. In addition, the city may provide written notice, either personally or by certified mail, to the owner of record of such building, structure or land. Notice must contain a description of the violation and a 30-day period within which to abate or correct the violation. If the owner of record does not bring the use of the building, structure or land into compliance within 30 days, the owner shall be cited for violation of the UDO. Each day any violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.

B.Bond forfeiture.

If, through inspection, it is determined that a person has failed to comply with an approved plan, a written notice to comply must be served upon that person. The notice must set forth the measures necessary to achieve compliance with the plan and state the time within which such measures must be completed. If the person fails to comply within the time specified, that person will be deemed in violation of the UDO and, in addition to other penalties, will be deemed to have forfeited their performance bond, if required to post one. The local issuing authority may call the bond or any part of the bond to be forfeited and may use the proceeds to hire a contractor to bring the site into compliance.

C.Withhold permits and licenses.

If the violation is by the owner of record of the building, structure or land, or their agent, employee or representative, in addition to other remedies available, the city may refuse or deny all city permits, licenses, certificates or applications to that owner or their agent until the violation is abated or corrected.

D.Withhold Certificate of Occupancy.

The city may refuse to issue a certificate of occupancy for the building or other improvements constructed or being constructed on the site until the applicant or other responsible person has taken the remedial measures set forth in the notice of violation or has otherwise cured the violations described in the notice.

E.Suspension, revocation or modification of permit.

The city may suspend, revoke or modify any permit authorized by this UDO. A suspended, revoked or modified permit may be reinstated after the applicant or other responsible person has taken the remedial measures set forth in the notice of violation or has otherwise cured the violations described in the notice, provided the permit may be reinstated upon such conditions as the city may deem necessary to enable the applicant or other responsible person to take the necessary remedial measures to cure such violations.

F.Monetary fines.

Any person who violates any provision of this UDO, or any permit condition or limitation established pursuant to this UDO, or who negligently or intentionally fails or refuses to comply with any final or emergency order of the city issued as provided herein will be liable for a fine established by the municipal court no greater than allowed by City Charter. For the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this section, the municipal court is authorized to impose a fine for each violation. Notwithstanding any limitation of law as to fines which can be assessed for violations of city ordinances except the limits established by City Charter, any magistrate court or any other court of competent jurisdiction trying cases brought as violations of this UDO under city ordinances approved will be authorized to impose penalties for such violations for each violation. Each day during which violation or failure or refusal to comply continues is a separate violation.

G.Remedies.

If any building or structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, converted or maintained or if any building, structure or land is used in violation of this UDO, the Mayor and City Council, the Building Official or any adjacent or other property owner who would be damaged by the violation, in addition to other remedies, may institute injunction, mandamus or other appropriate action or proceeding to stop the violation in the case of such building, structure or land use.

§ 103.5

Emergency work.

Sec. 103.5. Emergency work.

A.Emergency work necessary to preserve life or property.

When emergency work is performed under this UDO, the person performing it shall report the pertinent facts relating to the work to the UDO Administrator on the next business day after commencement of the work. Within ten days thereafter, the person shall apply for a permit and perform such work within such time as maybe determined by the Community and Economic Development Department.

ARTICLE 4. REVIEW PROCESS AND PROCEDURES.

DIVISION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

§ 104.1

Purpose.

Sec. 104.1. Purpose.

The provisions of this article are designed to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan and to balance the city’s interest in promoting the public health, safety and general welfare against the right to the unrestricted use of property.

This article identifies the process for amending this UDO, including the official zoning map; the process for amending the comprehensive plan and the future land use map; the process for reviewing requests for a conditional use, variance, limited use permit or special use permit; and, the steps required for filing and processing applications for permits under this UDO.

§ 104.2

Zoning Procedures Law.

Sec. 104.2. Zoning Procedures Law.

This article is intended to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Procedures Law (O.C.G.A. § 36-66-1 et seq.)

which act is incorporated by reference in its entirety into this UDO.

Where any provision of this article conflicts with any provision of state law, the state law shall control. Where this article is incomplete in having failed to incorporate a provision necessarily required for the implementation of state law, the provision of state law must be fully complied with.

§ 104.3

Decision-making responsibilities.

Sec. 104.3. Decision-making responsibilities.

There are three basic categories of land use decision-making responsibilities associated with this UDO:

A.Legislative review.

Establishes land use policy for future applications. A public hearing is required, and final approval must be made by the Mayor and City Council. Examples include adoption of an ordinance, amendments to an existing ordinance, the rezoning of property from one zoning classification to another, annexation of property and amendments to the comprehensive plan and/or future land use map and the granting or denial of a limited use permit and/or special use permit.

B.Quasi-judicial review.

Involves the application of discretionary standards adopted by the Mayor and City Council and required by this UDO. They require a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council, and procedural due process. Examples include review of appeals of administrative decisions made by a UDO Administrator and the granting or denial of a conditional use or variance.

C.Administrative review.

Involves the application of the standards within this UDO to an application by a UDO Administrator. A public hearing is not required. An administrative approval typically occurs late in the development process. Examples includes review and approval of conceptual and site development plans, preliminary plats, construction plans, final plats, building permits, certificates of occupancy and sign permits.

A summary of these review responsibilities is shown below:

Review and approval authority Approval process Ordinance Administrator Commission Key: reference City Council R Review D Decision UDO P&Z PH Public Hearing PM Public Meeting Legislative review Amendment to comprehensive plan Sec. 104.13.A. R R-PH D-PH Amendment to future land use map Sec. 104.13.A. R R-PH D-PH Amendment to text Sec. 104.13.A. R R-PH D-PH Amendment to zoning map (rezoning) Sec. 104.13.A. R R-PH D-PH Request for annexation Sec. 104.13.A. R R-PH D-PH Limited use permit Sec. 104.13.J. R R-PH D-PH Special use permit Sec. 104.13.K. R R-PH D-PH Quasi-judicial review Appeal of an administrative decision Sec. 104.18.B.1. R D-PH Conditional use Sec. 104.18.C. R D-PH Variance Sec. 104.18.D. R D-PH Administrative review Administrative Variance Sec. 104.24. D Building Plan Sec. 501.21.A D Conceptual Site Plan Sec. 407.17. R D

Table or figure — shown as printedverify at source
Construction Plans                                      Sec. 315.26.          D

Demolition Permit                     Sec. 501.21.A.4.                        D

Site Development Plan                                   Sec. 407.18.          D

Preliminary Plat Sec. 315.25 R D Sec. 104.4. - 7. Reserved.

DIVISION 2. REVIEW PROVISIONS.

§ 104.8

Common review provisions.

Sec. 104.8. Common review provisions.

A.Applicability.

The following requirements are common to the procedures within this article and apply to all applications submitted under its provisions. Generally, the submittal, review and approval procedures for all applications have six common elements:

B.Pre-application meeting;
1.Application submittal, including supporting documentation, studies and fee payments;
2.Review of the submittal by appropriate staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council after proper public notice has been made, if necessary;
3.A decision is made to approve, approve with conditions, or deny together with a description of the actions authorized and the time period for exercising those development rights;
4.If necessary, amending or appealing the decision; and
5.Recording the decision.
C.Standards governing applications.
1.Pre-application meeting.
a.When an applicant desires to undertake a development project or to make improvement to their property, they first make inquiries to the Community and Economic Development Department regarding the approval process. Based on the nature of the proposal, staff either schedules a pre -application meeting or provides the applicant with the proper forms for the appropriate review.

Most application requests are handled by administrative review and the applicant will likely work with city staff during the review process.

b.Most applications requiring a legislative or quasi-judicial review or that involve site plan or building plan approval will require a pre-application meeting.
c.At the pre-application meeting, the applicant will be informed of a preliminary determination as to which authorities will review the application. Each application is unique and special circumstances may come to light later over the course of processing the application that will require the involvement of additional review authorities, as follows:
i.If the property owner desires to undertake a development proposal involving a rezoning that is not consistent with the future land use map, an amendment to the future land use map must first be approved through legislative review.
ii.If the application is for a project that qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and is the first request for city action or is a revision to a previous DRI, the proposal must be transmitted to the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) for review.
iii.If the subject property in the application is not appropriately zoned, improvements to uses on the property are limited by the legal nonconformity provisions of the UDO or a request for rezoning must be approved through legislative review prior to commencement of development activities.
iv.If the application is for an appeal of an administrative decision, then the application will be routed for quasi-judicial review.
2.Submittal requirements.
a.Application forms and submittal requirements for each type of review process are maintained by and available from the Community and Economic Development Department offices or from the city’s website.
b.Application forms and supporting documentation shall be filed with the Community and Economic Development Department in such numbers as required by the UDO Administrator.
c.Each application shall be accompanied by a submittal fee as set forth in the schedule of fees as adopted by the Mayor and City Council. Under no circumstances shall the submittal fee or any part thereof be refunded.
3.Completeness determination.
a.Applications shall not be deemed complete and processed for review until all of the required information, including the submittal fee, is received.
b.The presumption is that all information listed on the application form is necessary to satisfy the requirements of this UDO. However, it is recognized that each request is unique, and additional or revised information may be required according to the specifics of an application. The UDO Administrator shall determine what additional information may be required after the application is received.
4.Application acceptance and initial administrative review.
a.Meeting dates and submittal deadlines for Planning and Zoning Commission and Mayor and City Council meetings are established each year and maintained by the Community and Economic Development Department and available on the city’s website. Applications must be submitted in accordance with the established submittal deadlines.
b.Once the application is ready for review, a case number will be assigned by the UDO Administrator and the information will be forwarded to the appropriate review authorities for analysis. The UDO Administrator will then notify the applicant of the proposed schedule for upcoming meetings and public hearings.
5.Submittal of revised application materials.
a.All revised application material must be submitted to the UDO Administrator who will route the materials to the appropriate review bodies.
b.Revised plans may not be sent directly to the Planning and Zoning Commission or to the Mayor and City Council by an applicant.
c.Revised application materials, either hard copy or electronic, will not be accepted within five (5)

days prior to a scheduled public meeting or public hearing.

6.Withdrawal of application.
a.Any application may be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the applicant by providing written notice to the UDO Administrator.
b.Under no circumstances shall the submittal fee or any part thereof be refunded.
c.For applications for legislative or quasi-judicial review, if a public hearing has been advertised by the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council, the withdrawn application will be announced at the hearing, and the application is subject to a refiling delay as identified herein.
d.If a public hearing has not been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council, the withdrawn application is not subject to the refiling delay.
e.An application for legislative review affecting the same or any portion of property may not be refiled, except upon initiation by Mayor and City Council, for a period of at least 180 calendar days.
D.Standards governing applications.
There are two (2) basic types of public notice:

Type of Public Hearing Published notice Posted notice Amendment to Comprehensive Plan x Annexation x x Appeal x Comprehensive Plan amendment x Conditional Use x x Future land use map amendment x Limited use permit x x Ordinance amendment x Special use permit x x Structure demolition x Telecommunications Tower Permit x x Variance x x Zoning map amendment (rezoning) x x

1.Preparation of Public Notice.

Notice of public hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council shall be prepared and presented for publication by the UDO Administrator or their designee.

2.Published Notification - Zoning Decisions.

All applications pertaining to zoning decisions as defined in O.C.G.A. 36-66-2(4) shall require a public hearing preceded by publication of a public hearing notice within a newspaper of general circulation in Fayette County at least fifteen (15), but not more than forty-five (45) days prior to the date of the public hearing. All such notices shall include, with the exception of amending the text of this Code, the application number, date, time, location, and purpose of the public hearing.

In addition, the following additional notice requirements shall be provided:

a.Rezonings. Existing and proposed zoning classifications;
b.Zoning Condition Amendments. The name of the project and the specific condition number being requested to be modified;
c.Conditional Use. Proposed use and existing zoning district;
d.Variances. Proposed Code provisions requested to be modified. Each article of this Code requested to be varied shall be separately identified;
e.Limited Use Permits. The purpose for which the LUP is being requested; and
f.Special Use Permits. The specific building type(s) being requested.
3.Published Notification - Quasi-judicial Decisions.

All applications before quasi-judicial officers, board, or agencies as defined in O.C.G.A. 36-66-3(1.1), shall require a public hearing preceded by publication of a public hearing notice within a newspaper of general circulation in Fayette County at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing.

Such notices shall include the application number, date, time, location, and purpose of the public hearing.

In addition, the following additional notice requirements shall be provided:

a.Variances. Proposed Code provisions requested to be modified. Each article of this Code requested to be varied shall be separately identified in all required notices;
b.Appeals of Administrative Decisions. Purpose of the appeal; and,
c.Appeals of Planning & Zoning Commission’s Decisions. Purpose of the appeal.
4.Public Hearing Sign(s) - Zoning Decisions.

Public Hearing signs related to zoning decisions as defined in O.C.G.A. 36-66-2(4) shall comply with the following procedures:

a.A public hearing sign shall be placed in a conspicuous location on the subject property at least twenty-one (21), but not more than forty-five (45) days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing.

The required sign shall state the time, place, and purpose of the public hearing.

b.In the case of multiple parcels, sufficient signs shall be posted to provide reasonable notice to interested persons. Where the land owned by the applicant does not border upon a public road in order that a passersby may see the sign which provides the public notice, the required sign shall be placed on the right-of-way of a public road nearest the property in question as well as upon the subject property.
c.Acts of vandalism or natural occurrences which may diminish the effectiveness of the public notice provided shall not void any proceedings or actions taken by any of the three boards or the UDO Administrator.
d.By filing an application for a review process that requires placement of a sign, the property owner and/or applicant are deemed to have given consent to enter onto the subject parcel(s) for the purposes of placing, replacing, maintaining and/or removing posted signs.
5.Public Hearing Signs - Quasi-judicial Decisions.

Public Hearing signs related to hearings before quasi-judicial officers, board, or agencies as defined in O.C.G.A. 36-66-3(1.1) shall comply with the following procedures:

a.A public hearing sign shall be placed in a conspicuous location on the subject property at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing. The required sign shall state the time, place, and purpose of the public hearing.
b.Where the land owned by the applicant does not border upon a public road in order that a passersby may see the sign which provides the public notice, the required sign shall be placed on the right-of-way of a public road nearest the property in question as well as upon the subject property.
c.Acts of vandalism or natural occurrences which may diminish the effectiveness of the public notice provided shall not void any proceedings or actions taken by any of the three boards or the UDO Administrator.
6.Mailed Notification.

Refer to Sec. 104.10.

E.Standards governing public hearings.
1.Disclosure of final interest.

In accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-67-A-2 et al., each member of the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council shall disclose, on the record, whether or not they or any member of their family have a property interest or financial interest in any real property affected by the rezoning action under consideration.

2.Disclosure of campaign contributions.

In accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-67-A-2 et al., an applicant for a rezoning action or a person speaking for or against a rezoning at a public hearing who has made, within two years immediately preceding the filing of an application for said rezoning action, campaign contributions aggregating $250.00 or more to a local government official who will consider the application, shall file a disclosure report with the city clerk.

3.General rules of procedure.

In accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-66-5 et al., the following policies and rules of procedure are hereby adopted to govern the calling and conducting of all Planning and Zoning Commission and the Mayor and City Council:

a.The presiding official of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting or hearing shall be the chairperson, or in the chairman’s absence, the vice-chair. In the case of a meeting and hearing of the Mayor and City Council, the mayor will serve as the presiding official, or in the mayor’s absence, the mayor-pro tem.
b.Unless otherwise provided by ordinance, rules of procedure for meetings shall follow Robert’s Rules of Order.
c.Public hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the Georgia Open Meetings Law (O.C.G.A.

§ 50-14-1 et seq.) and O.C.G.A. § 36-66-1 et seq.

d.Meetings and hearings shall be at the call of the presiding official and at such other times as the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Mayor and City Council may determine.
e.The Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Mayor and City Council shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact. Records of its examinations and other official actions will be immediately filed in the office of the city clerk and shall be a public record.
f.All individuals present at a public hearing shall be allowed to voice their opinions at a hearing unless there is a spokesperson representing a particular individual. The Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Mayor and City Council shall allow a maximum time period for presentation of data, evidence, and opinion by proponents of each decision and an equal maximum time period for presentation by opponents of each proposed decision, such time period shall be no less than ten minutes per side. The presiding official shall have the right to increase the maximum time limit for the presentation of data, evidence, and opinion by proponents and opponents of each decision, provided the maximum time for such presentations is the same for proponents and opponents.
g.Prior to speaking, each speaker shall identify himself/herself and state his/her current address.

Each speaker shall limit remarks to data, evidence and opinions relevant to the zoning proposal under consideration. Speakers shall address all remarks to the chair.

h.Following the presentations, the chair shall close the public hearing with respect to the zoning proposal under consideration and the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Mayor and City Council shall proceed with appropriate action.
i.Applications shall be considered in the order of filing. However, if such order of consideration would exhibit a hardship on the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Mayor and City Council, or the opponents, the presiding official has the authority to alter the order of consideration.
j.In cases involving extraordinary economic development opportunities for the community, the Mayor and City Council may pass a motion to hold a joint public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission and any other required review boards or committees to expedite the review process.
k.Printed copies of these rules of policy and procedure shall be available for distribution to the general public.
4.Action by Planning and Zoning Commission.
a.Following the public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a recommendation and submit its report to the Mayor and City Council prior to the date of the public hearing on such zoning proposal by the Mayor and City Council. If the Planning and Zoning Commission fails to submit a report within said period, it shall be deemed to have made no recommendation regarding the proposed change.
b.Applicants may submit to the UDO Administrator any conditions, alterations, changes, or amendments to an application for approval of an amendment to the zoning map, the future land use map or to the text of the UDO no less than seven days prior to the date at which the application is to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. If such conditions, alterations, changes or amendments have not been submitted as required by this subsection, the Planning and Zoning Commission may, at its discretion, defer action on the application until its next regular meeting.
c.In reviewing text amendments to the UDO and changes to the zoning map, the Planning and Zoning Commission will make recommendations based on the zoning standards prescribed in Sec. 104-13.E.1. of this UDO.
d.In reviewing requests to amend the comprehensive plan and/or the future land use map, the Planning and Zoning Commission will make recommendations based on the standards prescribed in Sec. 104-13.E.2. of this UDO.
e.In reviewing requests for a conditional use the Planning and Zoning Commission will make recommendations based on the standards and factors governing review of Sec. 105.C.7. of this UDO.
5.Action by the Mayor and City Council.

Following its public hearing, the Mayor and City Council may:

a.Approve, by ordinance, as presented;
b.Approve, by ordinance, with conditions;
c.Approve, by ordinance, a similar or less intense use (including special uses), with or without conditions, in the case of a rezoning of property;
d.Deny the request in whole or in part;
e.Refer, by motion and majority vote, the matter back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for reconsideration;
f.By motion, table final action to a future regularly scheduled business session or public hearing.
6.Notification.
a.Within five business days after a decision is made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and/ or the Mayor and City Council, a copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant by the UDO Administrator. In the case of permit issuance, the permit constitutes written notice of the decision.
b.A record of the action taken on each application will be kept on file in the offices of the Community and Economic Development Department and each record of action is a matter of public record.
7.Approval subject to conditions.

In adopting an amendment to the zoning map or approving a limited use permit or special use permit, the Mayor and City Council may impose special conditions which they deem necessary to make the requested action acceptable and consistent with the purposes of the district(s) involved and to further the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. It is not the intention of the Mayor and City Council to impose restrictions or conditions which will place an unreasonable financial burden on the applicant. Such conditions may consist of, but are not limited to, the following:

a.Restrictions as to what land uses or activities shall be permitted;
b.Permitted hours of operation;
c.Setback requirements from any lot line;
d.Specified or prohibited locations for buildings, parking, loading or storage areas or other land uses;
e.Maximum building heights or other dimensions;
f.Architectural style, or exterior treatments;
g.Driveway curb cut restrictions, or inter-parcel access requirements;
h.Landscaping requirements which may include location, type and maintenance of plant materials, fences, walls, earth berms or other buffer provisions;
i.Preservation of existing trees or other vegetation;
j.Special measures to alleviate undesirable views, light, glare, noise, dust or odor;
k.A requirement that the existing building(s) be removed or retained, or a limitation on exterior modifications of existing buildings;
l.Special drainage or erosion provisions;
m.A requirement that developers must build according to the site plans as adopted;
n.Public facility improvements by the owner;
o.Any other requirement that the Mayor and City Council may deem appropriate; and
p.Any other requirement deemed appropriate and necessary as a condition of rezoning.
8.Conditions of approval.
Such conditions shall:
a.Only be valid if they are included in the motion approving the amendment, the limited use permit or the special use permit;
b.Be recorded in the ordinance or resolution of the Mayor and City Council if enacted pursuant to an amendment of the text of the UDO or the zoning map;
c.Be continually in effect, or for the period of time specified in the amendment, the limited use permit or the special use permit;
d.Be required of the property owner and all subsequent owners as a condition of their use of the property; and,
e.Be interpreted and continually enforced by the UDO Administrator in the same manner as any other provision of this UDO.
9.Violation of conditions.

Notwithstanding any other remedies available in this UDO and under local and state law, violations of conditions imposed pursuant to this section shall be handled in accordance with the enforcement and penalties provisions stated in the Code of Ordinances.

10.Lapse of time requirements for reapplication.

No application or reapplication for any zoning map amendment affecting the same land or any portion thereof shall be acted upon or otherwise considered by the city within 12 months from the date of last action by the Mayor and City Council that defeated a previous rezoning application unless such 12 month period is waived by the Mayor and City Council, and in no case may such an application or reapplication be considered in less than six months from the date of last action by the Mayor and City Council that defeated a previous rezoning application.

§ 104.9

Procedures specific to zoning decision to allow for multi-family

Sec. 104.9. Procedures specific to zoning decision to allow for multi-family development.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter to the contrary, when a proposed zoning decision relates to an amendment of the zoning ordinance to revise one or more zoning classifications or definitions relating to single-family residential uses of property so as to authorize multifamily uses of property pursuant to such classification or definitions, or to grant blanket permission, under certain or all circumstances, for property owners to deviate from the existing zoning requirements of a single-family residential zoning, such zoning decision must be adopted in the following manner:

1.The zoning decision shall be adopted at two regular meetings of the local government making the zoning decision, during a period of not less than 21 days apart; and
2.Prior to the first meeting provided for in subparagraph 1. of this section, at least two public hearings shall be held on the proposed action. Such public hearings shall be held at least three months and not more than nine months prior to the date of final action on the zoning decision. Furthermore, at least one of the public hearings must be held between the hours of 5:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. The hearings required by this paragraph shall be in addition to any hearing required herein. The local government shall give notice of such hearing by:
a.Posting notice at least twenty-one (21), but not more than forty-five (45) days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing on each affected premises in the manner prescribed herein; provided, however, that when more than 500 parcels are affected, in which case posting notice is required every 500 feet in the affected area; and
b.Publishing in a newspaper of general circulation within the territorial boundaries of the local government a notice of each hearing at least 15 days and not more than 45 days prior to the date of the hearing.
3.Both the posted notice and the published notice shall include a prominent statement that the proposed zoning decision relates to or will authorize multifamily uses or give blanket permission to the property owner to deviate from the zoning requirements of a single-family residential zoning of property in classification previously relating to single-family residential uses. The published notice shall be at least nine column inches in size and shall not be located in the classified advertising section of the newspaper. The notice shall state that a copy of the proposed amendment is on file in the office of the clerk or the recording officer of the local government and in the office of the clerk of the superior court of the county of the legal situs of the local government for the purpose of examination and inspection by the public. The local government shall furnish anyone, upon written request, a copy of the proposed amendment, at no cost.
4.The provisions of paragraph 1. of this subsection shall also apply to any zoning decisions that provide for the abolition of all single-family residential zoning classifications within the territorial boundaries of a local government or zoning decisions that result in the rezoning of all property zoned for single-family residential uses within 200 the territorial boundaries of a local government to multifamily residential uses of property.
5.This subsection shall not apply to zoning decisions for the rezoning of property from a single-family residential use of property to a multifamily residential use of property when the rezoning is initiated by the owner or authorized agent of the owner of such property.
§ 104.10

Public notification requirements via first class mail.

Sec. 104.10. Public notification requirements via first class mail.

A.Annexation and/or rezoning requests.

At least fifteen (15) days prior to the required public hearing for annexations and/or rezoning requests, the UDO Administrator shall cause a notice of public hearing to be sent by first class mail to all owners of property adjacent to the property considered for annexation and/or rezoning, and to all owners of property located within 1,000 feet of the property to be considered for annexation and/or rezoning. Property ownership shall be as shown by the Fayette County Tax Digest for the year in which the annexation and/or rezoning application is considered. City Officials have no duty to inquire into ownership beyond that shown on said tax digest. As used in this section, the phrase "owners of adjacent property" means any owner of property that physically touches the property considered for annexation and/or rezoning.

B.Conceptual site plan and/or preliminary plats.

The city shall send notification to owners of residential property within 1,000 feet of the subject tract within ten days after a request for conceptual site plan and/or preliminary plat is submitted for review.

Said notification shall include the date and time these items will be heard before the Planning and Zoning Commission. The UDO Administrator shall have the discretion to limit notification to those parcels who might be impacted by the proposed development.

C.Notices not received.

When public notice of a hearing is required, the fact that the notice is not received due to an error that was not the fault of the city does not prevent the public hearing from happening, change any decision made at the public hearing, or prevent the application from continuing to move forward through the review process.

Sec. 104.11. - 12. Reserved.

DIVISION 3. LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PROVISIONS.

§ 104.13

Legislative review.

Sec. 104.13. Legislative review.

A.Applicability.

The following requirements apply to applications subject to legislative review and action by the Mayor and City Council, including:

1.Annexations;
2.Comprehensive plan amendments;
3.Future land use map amendments;
4.Limited use permits;
5.Special use permits;
6.Text amendments; and
7.Zoning map amendments (rezoning).
B.Initiation of a legislative review.
1.Applications for legislative review may be initiated as follows:
a.Amendments to the zoning map, the comprehensive plan or to the future land use map may be initiated by the Mayor and City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission or by application by the owner of the property which is the subject of the proposed amendment or his authorized agent, such authorization to be notarized and attached to the application.
b.Amendments to the text of the UDO may be initiated by the Mayor and City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission or by application by any citizen of the city.
c.When amendments are initiated by the Mayor and City Council or the Planning and Zoning Commission, the required fee shall be waived.
d.Requests for a limited use permit and/or a special use permit shall be initiated by application by the owner of the property which is the subject of the requested permit or his authorized agent, such authorization to be notarized and attached to the application.
2.Order of amendments.
a.The text of the UDO may be amended without prior or subsequent amendment to the future land use map or the zoning map.
b.The zoning map may be amended without an amendment to the future land use map if the proposed amendment would permit a use that is permitted by the future land use map.
c.If a proposed amendment to the zoning map would permit a use that is not authorized within the land use category of the subject property as shown on the future land use map, the applicant must first obtain an appropriate amendment to the future land use map before applying for the rezoning.
d.The future land use map may be amended regardless of the zoning district in which the subject property is located.
e.Where an application to amend the future land use map and an application to amend the zoning map each affect the same property and are scheduled to be heard at the same hearing, the application to amend the future land use map shall be heard first and action authorized by this UDO taken before the application to amend the zoning map is heard and action taken with respect thereto.
3.Map amendments.

If, in accordance with the provisions of this article, changes are made in district boundaries or other matters portrayed on the official zoning map, such changes shall be entered on the official zoning map promptly after the amendment has been approved by the Mayor and City Council. The date the amendment was adopted and the signatures of the Mayor and City Council shall be entered on the official zoning map in connection with any changes made on the map.

In the event the official zoning map becomes damaged, destroyed, lost or difficult to interpret because of the nature or number of changes and additions, the Mayor and City Council may by resolution adopt a new official zoning map which shall supersede the prior official zoning map. The new official zoning map may correct drafting or other errors or omissions in the prior official zoning map, but no such correction shall have the effect of amending the original official zoning map. Any such replacement map shall bear the date of adoption and the signatures of the Mayor and City Council.

C.Limitation on permits related to map amendments.
1.Once a zoning map amendment is initiated, no application for a clearing, grubbing, grading, septic tank, building, development or other similar permit, and no application for a variance, conditional use , limited use permit or special use permit for the affected property shall be accepted for processing or acted upon until final action is taken by the Mayor and City Council on the proposed map amendment.
2.If the Mayor and City Council does not take final action on the proposed map amendment within six months from the date of initiation, such other additional applications shall again be accepted and reviewed pursuant to existing zoning.
3.Other applications may be accepted during the map amendment process if the use or activity in the other application is authorized under the same conditions in both the existing and proposed zoning district.
D.Consistency with comprehensive plan character area.
1.Any applicant seeking to rezone property to a classification that is inconsistent with the adopted comprehensive plan must first obtain approval of an amendment to the comprehensive plan from the Mayor and City Council.
2.The comprehensive plan shall be routinely reviewed and possibly amended according to a set schedule approved by the Mayor and City Council.
3.Exceptions may be granted by the Mayor and City Council in between the regular review cycle in cases of demonstrated hardship, or in cases of developments that may provide extraordinary benefits to the community. Requests for exceptions shall be subject to approval by Mayor and City Council during a Mayor and City Council meeting.
E.Standards and factors governing review.
1.The following standards are relevant and shall be used in balancing the interest in promoting the public health, safety, morality, or general welfare against the right to the unrestricted use of property and shall govern the exercise of zoning power:
a.Whether the zoning proposal will permit a use that is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property;
b.Whether the zoning proposal will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby property;
c.Whether the property to be affected by the zoning proposal has a reasonable economic use as currently zoned;
d.Whether the zoning proposal will result in a use which will or could cause an excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities, or schools;
e.Whether the zoning proposal is in conformity with the policy and intent of the comprehensive plan; and
f.Whether there are other existing or changing conditions affecting the use and development of the property which give supporting grounds for either approval or disapproval of the zoning proposal.
2.Amendments to the comprehensive plan and/or future land use map.

The following standards and factors are found to be relevant and shall be used for evaluating applications for amendments to the comprehensive plan and/or future land use map:

a.Whether the proposed land use change will permit uses that are suitable in consideration of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property or properties;
b.Whether the proposed land use change will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby property or properties;
c.Whether the proposed land use change will result in uses which will or could cause excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities, or schools;
d.Whether the amendment is consistent with the written policies in the comprehensive plan text and any applicable small areas studies;
e.Whether there are potential impacts on property or properties in an adjoining governmental jurisdiction, in cases of proposed changes near municipal boundary lines;
f.Whether there are other existing or changing conditions affecting the use and development of the affected land areas which support either approval or denial of the proposed land use change;

and

g.Whether there will be an impact on historic buildings, sites, districts or archaeological resources resulting from the proposed change.
F.Change in conditions of an approved rezoning.

Requests to change the conditions of an approved rezoning shall be subject to the same application, review and approval process as a new application, including the payment of relevant fees.

G.Revocation of zoning.

If, within 12 months from the date the rezoning was approved, the applicant fails to initiate development of the subject site in conformity with said uses and development plans, including any conditions imposed by the Mayor and City Council, the zoning granted in the ordinance of rezoning shall be subject to revocation, and the land’s zoning classification reverted to the zoning classification of the land prior to the rezoning. If an annexation was granted, the site shall be subject to reversion to the zoning classification most compatible with that of the surrounding area, as determined by the Mayor and City Council. Prior to reversion the property owner shall be notified in writing at the owner’s last address known to the City of the intent to revoke current zoning and date and time of public hearing. Standards governing public hearings as identified in Sec. 104.8.D. shall be followed. The City Council shall make the final decision.

Substantial compliance means the applicant must have initiated development of the project to the point that it is clearly in progress in accordance with the approved development plans. The applicant’s final representation of the proposed use of the site, the final development plans presented to the Mayor and City Council in support of the application (and accepted by the Mayor and City Council as reflected in the zoning ordinance or the council’s minutes of the proceedings), and the implementation of any conditions imposed upon the proposed use and/or development plans, shall be conditions to the continued existence of any rezoning granted by this chapter.

H.Restrictions on applications.

If the request to amend the zoning map is denied by the Mayor and Council, the same property may not be considered for a zoning map amendment until the expiration of six months following the denial of the zoning map amendment.

An application for a zoning map amendment affecting the same parcel shall not be accepted more than once every 12 months, said interval to begin with the date of a final decision by the Mayor and City Council. The 12-month interval shall not apply to applications for a zoning map amendment that is initiated by the Mayor and City Council or the Planning and Zoning Commission.

I.Procedures for annexation.

Upon accepting an application for annexation pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-36-21 or a petition for annexation pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-36-32, or upon adopting a resolution calling for an annexation referendum pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-36-57, the city shall give notice to Fayette County pursuant to O.C.G.A. §36-36-6 and O.C.G.A. § 36-36-111.

If the County files a proper Notice of Objection pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-36-113, the city shall follow the procedures of O.C.G.A. Title 36, Chapter 36, Article 7.

Prior to a final decision by the Mayor and City Council on any annexation action pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-36-21 or 36-36-32, the city shall adhere to the standards governing public notice requirements and public hearings as identified in Sec.s 104.8.C. and D. herein.

J.Limited Use Permit.
1.Authority.

The Mayor and City Council shall have the authority to consider requests for a limited use permit in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth herein.

2.Purpose.
a.A limited use permit is specific to those lots, buildings, structures and/or uses of land within the Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) District that, as of the adoption of the UDO and amended Zoning Map, are now considered to be nonconforming with the DMU zoning established within this UDO.
b.The limited use permit is intended as a means for the City Council to authorize the redevelopment, renovation or expansion of these lots, buildings, structures and/or uses of land.
c.The limited use permit is not intended to alter the base zoning of the property but to allow the lot, buildings, structures and/or uses of land to be used subject to specific understandings and conditions.
3.Initiation.

Any person, firm, corporation or agency may submit an application for a limited use permit provided they are the owner or the owner’s representative of the property for which the application is being submitted.

4.Application procedures.

Refer to Sec.104.8. of this UDO for limited use permit application procedures.

5.Staff report.

The UDO Administrator shall conduct a site inspection and prepare a staff report containing an analysis of each application for a limited use permit. The staff report and supporting documentation shall be presented in written form to the Planning and Zoning Commission and to City Council prior to the scheduled public hearing date.

6.Public Hearing procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.D. of this UDO.

7.Standards and factors governing review.

The following requirements shall be considered by City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in evaluating and deciding any application for a limited use permit:

a.The proposal shall be consistent with the needs of the neighborhood or the community as a whole and would and would achieve more of the objective of the comprehensive plan than is currently met under the present use of the property, with the present structures located on the property, or with the present property layout;
b.The proposal is at least as compatible with the zoning and/or intensity of the adjoining properties as the current use of the property;
c.The proposal shall be suitable for the subject site(s) based on required yard setbacks, buffers open space, off-street parking, stormwater facilities and all other applicable requirements of the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located;
d.The proposal includes buildings or structures that are compatible with the size, scale and massing of buildings on adjoining or nearby lots;
e.The proposal shall not cause excessive or burdensome use of existing public streets, transportation facilities, utilities or other public facilities;
f.The proposal provides for buffers, fencing and/or landscaping to ensure appropriate transitions between the subject property and adjoining properties;
g.The proposal does not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare or the quiet enjoyment of the surrounding properties or neighborhoods by reason of noise, smoke, odor, dust, or vibration, or by hours of operation;
h.There are existing or changing conditions which, because of their impact on the public health, safety, morality and general welfare of the community, give supporting grounds for either approval or disapproval of the proposed use.
8.Limitations of limited use permits.
a.Development of an approved limited use. The issuance of a limited use permit shall only constitute approval of the redevelopment, renovation and/or expansion of existing lots, buildings, structures and/or uses of land within the DMU District. Modifications to existing lots, buildings, structures and/or uses of land shall not commence until the applicant has secured all other permits and approvals required by any applicable law or regulation.
b.Expiration of a limited use permit. Unless a land disturbance permit, building permit and/or other required permits are applied for within twelve (12) months of the City Council 's approval of the limited use permit and construction activities are promptly begun and diligently pursued thereafter, the limited use permit shall expire automatically, unless the permit is extended upon application to the City Council as identified herein.
c.Time extension of a limited use permit. A time limitation imposed on a limited use permit by the City Council and the expiration date established herein of this section may be extended no more than once for twelve (12) consecutive months upon written request by the applicant and approval by the City Council.

Modifications to a limited use permit. Changes to an approved limited use permit, including d.

changes to approved conditions, expansion of the approved use, or expansion of building square footage, shall be subject to the same application, review and approval process as a new application, including the payment of relevant fees.

Enforcement. The UDO Administrator shall periodically examine the subject lot, building, e.

structure and/or use of land associated with the limited use to determine compliance with the requirements of any approvals and conditions. If it is found the approvals and conditions are being violated, a written notice shall be issued to the owner of the property outlining the nature of the violations and giving the owner of the property a maximum of 30 days to come into compliance. If after 30 days the violations continue to exist, the UDO Administrator shall forward a report to the City Council which may recommend that action be taken to remove the limited use permit from the property.

9.Notification of limited use permits.
a.Upon approval by the City Council, the limited use permit will be designated on the Official Zoning Map and the UDO Administrator shall issue notice to the owner of the property identifying the nature of the limited use permit, any approval and conditions associated with the permit, as well as the requirements of this subsection.
b.The Building Department shall not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the limited use unless all approvals and any conditions associated with the limited use permit have been fulfilled by the owner of the property.
10.Transfer of limited use permits.
a.A limited use permit, including the site plan and any approval and conditions imposed at the time of adoption by City Council, is granted solely to the person, corporation or other legal entity to which the limited use permit was granted. Should there be a change in ownership, the city shall maintain the authority to initiate a process to revoke the limited use permit.
b.A limited use permit may only be transferred from one person, corporation, or other legal entity to another person, corporation, or other legal entity upon application to the UDO Administrator.

Any such application by any person, corporation, or other legal entity to transfer a limited use permit shall be accompanied by an affidavit of the proposed transferee certifying that the new owner or operator is familiar with and will abide by the approved site plan and all of the approvals and conditions, if any, imposed by the City Council at the time of the grant of the limited use permit.

c.If an application to the City Council for a limited use permit is submitted due to an existing violation of this chapter and such application for limited use permit is denied, the violation shall be required to be corrected within 30 days of such denial. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the UDO Administrator may extend the deadline for correction of the violation for a period up to 90 days following the denial of the limited use permit upon a showing that the violation cannot reasonably be corrected within 30 days.
K.Special Use Permit (SUP).
1.Authority.

The City Council shall have the authority to consider requests for a special use permit in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth herein.

2.Purpose.

A special use permit is limited to those parcels of land within the Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) District established within this UDO. The special use permit is intended as a means for City Council to review certain developments and/or building types to ensure they are compatible with the neighborhoods in which they are proposed. The special use permit is not intended to alter the base zoning of the property but to allow for further review and to adopt specific understandings and conditions specific to the proposal.

3.Initiation.

Any person, firm, corporation or agency may submit an application provided they are the owner or the owner’s representative of the property for which the application is being submitted.

4.Application procedures.

Refer to Sec.104.8. of this UDO.

5.Staff report.

The UDO Administrator shall conduct a site inspection and prepare a staff report containing an analysis of each application. The staff report and supporting documentation shall be presented in written form to the Planning and Zoning Commission and to City Council prior to the scheduled public hearing date.

6.Public Hearing procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.D. of this UDO.

7.Standards and factors governing review.
a.The proposal shall incorporate aesthetics and architectural design features that are compatible with the intent and requirements of this UDO and all applicable zoning ordinance regulations;
b.The proposal shall be consistent with the needs of the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole;
c.The proposal shall incorporate buildings that are appropriate in relation to the size, scale and massing of the subject property and in relation to the size, scale and massing of adjacent and nearby lots and buildings;
d.The proposal shall provide for all required yards, open space, off-street parking, transitional buffer zones, and all other applicable requirements of the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located;
e.The proposal shall be compatible with adjoining properties and land uses and with other properties and land uses in the district;
f.The proposal shall not create adverse impacts upon any adjoining land use by reason of traffic volume/congestion, noise, smoke, odor, dust, or vibration generated by the proposed use;
g.The proposal shall provide adequate public services, public facilities and utilities;
h.The proposal shall not result in an over-concentration of similar building types within the neighborhood in which the proposed use will be developed;
i.The adjoining roadways shall provide for sufficient traffic carrying capacity so as not to unduly increase traffic and create congestion in the area;
j.The proposal shall provide sufficient ingress and egress to the development, buildings, structures, and uses thereon, with particular reference to pedestrian and automotive safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in the event of fire or other emergency;
k.The proposal shall provide adequate provisions for refuse and service areas.

Sec. 104.14. - 17. Reserved.

DIVISION 4. QUASI-JUDICIAL REVIEW PROVISIONS.

§ 104.18

Quasi-judicial review.

Sec. 104.18. Quasi-judicial review.

A.Applicability.

The following requirements apply to all applications subject to quasi-judicial review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or the Mayor and City Council, including:

1.An appeal of a determination made by a UDO Administrator requires a public hearing in front of the Mayor and City Council;
2.A conditional use requires a public hearing in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
3.A variance requires a public hearing in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
B.Initiation of quasi-judicial review.
1.Appeal of a UDO Administrator’s determination.

An appeal from a final written determination of a UDO Administrator regarding this UDO may be taken to the Mayor and City Council by any person aggrieved by such determination, or by any officer, department, board or agency of the city affected by such determination.

2.Time for filing appeal; contents of notice.

Such appeal shall be taken within ten calendar days from the date of a final written determination of the UDO Administrator by filing with the City Clerk a written notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The notice of appeal shall be submitted on forms available from the City Clerk.

3.Transmission of record to the Mayor and City Council.

Upon receipt of a complete notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall forthwith transmit to the Mayor and City Council all the papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken.

4.Stay of proceedings.

An appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless the City Clerk certifies to the Mayor and City Council, after the notice of appeal shall have been filed with the City Clerk, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would, in the City Clerk’s opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by a restraining order which may be granted by the Mayor and City Council or by a court of record on application with notice to the City Clerk and on due cause shown.

6.Public hearing procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.D. of this UDO.

7.Decisions.
a.Following consideration of all testimony, documentary evidence, and matters of record, the Mayor and City Council shall make a determination on each appeal at the conclusion of the public hearing unless an extension of time is agreed to in writing by the appealing party and the Mayor and City Council.
b.The Mayor and City Council may reverse, defer, affirm, or modify any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the UDO Administrator and to that end shall have all the powers of the UDO Administrator from whom the appeal was taken.
c.An appeal shall be sustained or the decision modified only upon an expressed finding by the Mayor and City Council that the UDO Administrator’s action below was based on an erroneous finding of a material fact, or that said official’s action was arbitrary. The action of the Mayor and City Council on an administrative appeal shall be final.
d.Printed copies of these rules of policy and procedure shall be available for distribution to the general public.
8.Appeals from final decision of the Mayor and City Council.

Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the Mayor and City Council, or any officer, department or agency of the city affected by such decision, may appeal from such decision to the Superior Court of Fayette County, Georgia by writ of certiorari. Such appeal shall be filed within 30 days after decision of the Mayor and City Council is rendered.

9.Transmitting record.

Within the time prescribed by and pursuant to applicable state law, the UDO Administrator shall cause to be filed with the Superior Court of Fayette County, Georgia a certified copy of the proceedings had before the Mayor and City Council, including a transcript of the evidence heard before it, if any, and the decision of the board.

C.Conditional use.
1.Authority The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to consider requests for a conditional use in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth herein.
2.Purpose The purpose of a conditional use is to provide a process for a use that is generally compatible with the use characteristics of a zoning district, but requires individual review of its location, design, height, intensity, configuration and public facility impact to determine the appropriateness of the use for any particular site and its compatibility with adjacent uses. A conditional use allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve a use on a particular parcel without changing the general zoning district.
3.Initiation Any person, firm, corporation or agency may submit an application provided they are the owner or the owner’s representative of the property for which the application is being submitted.
4.Application procedures.

Refer to Sec.104.8.B of this UDO.

5.Staff report.

The UDO Administrator shall conduct a site inspection and prepare an analysis of each application.

The staff report and supporting documentation shall be presented in written form to the appropriate Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the scheduled public hearing date.

6.Public Hearing procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.D. of this UDO.

7.Standards and factors governing review of conditional use.

The following standards and factors are found to be relevant and shall be used for evaluating applications for a conditional use:

a.Whether the policies and objectives of the comprehensive plan, particularly in relationship to the proposed site and surrounding area align and support the proposal;
b.Whether the proposed use is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property;
c.Whether the proposed use is consistent with the requirements of the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located;
d.Whether the proposed use results in a use which will or could cause an excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or other public facilities;
e.Whether there is adequate ingress and egress to the subject property, including evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed use relative to street capacity and safety of public streets and nearby pedestrian uses; and
f.Whether there are other existing or changing conditions which, because of their impact on the public health, safety, morality and general welfare of the community, give supporting grounds for either approval or disapproval of the proposed use.
8.Compliance with conditional use requirements.
a.Approval of a conditional use shall only constitute approval of the proposed use, and development of the use shall not be carried out until the applicant has secured all other permits and approvals required. The Building Official shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for the specific use unless all requirements of the conditional use have been fulfilled by the owner of the property.
b.If a conditional use is granted, all conditions which may have been attached to the approval are binding on the property, and all subsequent development and use of the property shall be in accordance with the approved plan and conditions. Once established, the conditional use shall be in continuous operation. Upon discovery that the operation of the conditional use has or had ceased for a period of 90 days or more and the owner of the property has not requested voluntary termination of the conditional use, the UDO Administrator may forward a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission which may recommend that action be taken to terminate the conditional use from the property.
c.The UDO Administrator shall have the right to periodically examine the operation of the conditional use to determine compliance with the requirements and any conditions of approval.
d.If the UDO Administrator determines that the requirements and conditions are being violated, a written notice shall be sent by certified mail return receipt requested to the owner of the property outlining the nature of the violation and giving the owner of the property a maximum of ten days to come into compliance. The notice shall also state that the owner has the right to appeal the determination of the UDO Administrator to the Mayor and City Council.
e.If after ten days the violations continue to exist, the UDO Administrator shall forward a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may recommend that action be taken to remove or terminate the conditional use from the property, or to exercise all other rights of enforcement permitted by law.
9.Conditional use in residential zoning districts.

A conditional use approved within a residential zoning district where the use is proposed to operate in a dwelling or as an accessory use to a dwelling shall be subject to the following requirements:

a.The conditional use shall be valid for no more than an initial two-year period. Upon or before the expiration of the conditional use, the owner shall make application to renew the conditional use if continuance is desired. As part of the renewal of a conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission may waive any subsequent time limitation.
b.The conditional use shall operate within the dwelling on the property or, if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, in an accessory structure.
c.The exterior character of the dwelling shall be preserved in its residential state and there shall be no outside evidence of the operation of the conditional use to the neighborhood, except for any accessory structure approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
d.The owner of the property or business shall occupy the property and shall operate any business associated with the conditional use.
10.Revisions to an approved conditional use.

Once approved, no major amendments to a conditional use shall be authorized unless such amendments have been applied for and approved in accordance with all procedural requirements identified herein. Major amendments are those that impact adjoining or nearby property in any manner other than incidentally, and shall include but not be limited to the following:

a.Changes to another use;
b.Increase in density or intensity;
c.Enlarging, expanding or increasing the size or intensity of the approved use;
d.Increase in the requirements for off-street parking spaces;
e.Substantial change to the exterior appearance of buildings that is visible from any public right-of-way; or
f.The addition of outdoor equipment and machinery.
D.Variance.
1.Authority.

The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to consider variances including reasonable accommodations from the requirements of this UDO in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth herein.

2.Purpose.

The purpose of a variance is to provide a mechanism when, owing to special conditions, the strict application of this UDO would impose on a landowner exceptional and undue hardship that can be mitigated without conferring on the applicant special privilege.

3.Initiation.

Any person, firm, corporation or agency may submit an application provided they are the owner or the owner’s representative of the property for which the application is being submitted.

4.Application procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.B. of this UDO.

5.Staff report.

The UDO Administrator shall conduct a site inspection and prepare an analysis of each application.

The staff report and supporting documentation shall be presented in written form to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the scheduled public hearing date.

6.Public hearing procedures.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.D. of this UDO.

7.Standards and factors governing review of variance applications.

The following standards and factors are found to be relevant and shall be used for evaluating applications for variances:

a.The special circumstances or conditions applying to the building or land in question are peculiar to such premises and do not apply generally to other land or buildings in the vicinity;
b.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a property right and not merely to serve as a convenience to the applicant;
c.The condition from which relief or a variance is sought did not result from action by the applicant;
d.The authorizing of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or imperil the public safety, or unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding areas, or in any other respect impair the health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare of the inhabitants of the city;
e.The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive plan;
f.The granting of the variance will not allow a structure or use in a district restricted against such structure or use; and
g.Reasonable accommodations for citizens with disabilities as required by the U.S. Fair Housing Laws when such accommodation is necessary to afford individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to housing.
8.Variances prohibited.

No variance may be granted for a use of land, building or structure that is explicitly prohibited by the UDO or which would result in a greater intensity of development on a property than would otherwise be allowed if no variance were involved.

9.Resubmittal.

When action is unfavorable on an application for variance or where the applicant withdraws the application prior to final action by the Planning and Zoning Commission, a substantially similar application may not be resubmitted for at least one year from the date of denial or withdrawal. This requirement may be waived for good cause by the UDO Administrator.

Sec. 104.19. - 22. Reserved.

DIVISION 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROVISIONS.

§ 104.23

Administrative review.

Sec. 104.23. Administrative review.

Permits that may be approved by a UDO Administrator through the administrative review process fall under three review sub-categories:

1.Zoning and site plan review by the UDO Administrator;
2.Engineering review by the City Engineer, and
3.Building review by the Building Official.

Specifically, review responsibilities are shown in the following table:

Review and approval authority Approval process Ordinance Administrator City Engineer Building Official reference Fire Marshal UDO Administrative Variance Sec. 104.24. A Accessory Building Sec. 401.29. R R A R As-built drawings R A R R Banner Permit Sec. 406.20.3. A Building Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. R A R Certificate of Completion Sec. 501.38.A. R R A Certificate of Occupancy Sec. 501.38.B. R R A Change of Occupancy Certificate Sec. 501.38.B. A R Commercial Building Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. R A R Commercial Electrical Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Conceptual Site Plan (site) Sec. 407.17. A R R R Construction Plans (subdivision) Sec. 315.26. R A R R Construction Trailer Permit Sec. 501.21. A Demolition Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. R A R Development Plans (site) Sec. 407.18. R A R R Driveway and Right of Way Permits Sec. 313.5 A R Fence Permit Sec. 401.35. R R A Film Permit A R R R Final Plat Sec. 315.28. R A R R Foundation Permit Sec. 501.21.A.4. R A Home Occupation Permit Sec. 207.8 R R R Land Disturbance Permit Sec. 315.27 & 407.22. R A R R Landscape Plan Sec. 403.53. R A Low-voltage Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Mechanical Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Parade Permit Sec. 313.8. R R R Parking Lot Tent Sale Permit Sec. 207.20. A R Parking Waiver Sec. 104.24.H. A Plat Amendment Sec. 315.20. R A R R Plumbing Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Pool Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. R R A Preliminary Plat (subdivision) Sec. 315.25. R A R R Re-roof Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Residential Electrical Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Residential New Construction Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Residential Remodel Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Roof Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Sign Permit Sec. 406.11. A Sign Variance Sec. 104.24.7 A Storage Trailer Permit Sec. 207.19. A R R Temporary Sign Permit Sec. 406.21. A Temporary Use Permit Sec. 207.84. A Tent Permit Sec. 401.19. A R R Trade Permit Sec. 501.21.A.1. A Tree Removal Permit Sec. 403.9. A Utility Encroachment Permit Sec. 313.6. R R A Utility Restoration Permit Sec. 501.39. R A Zoning Compliance Letter Sec. 104.25. A Zoning Verification Letter A

§ 104.24

Administrative variances.

Sec. 104.24. Administrative variances.

A.Power to grant administrative variances.

The UDO Administrator shall have the authority to grant administrative variances (except for density and use variances) from the development standards as established in the UDO where, in their opinion, the intent of the UDO can be achieved, and equal performance including reasonable accommodations as defined at Sec. 104.18.24.I. herein obtained by granting an administrative variance.

B.Limitations on administrative variances.

The authority to grant administrative variances shall be limited to the following:

1.Setbacks.

A reduction of up to 10% of the numeric standard for a minimum building setback. Such reduction shall not alleviate minimum building separation requirements identified in the Building Code.

2.Lot coverage.

An increase of up to 10% beyond the numeric standard for lot coverage.

3.Building height.

Up to but not exceeding ten feet, provided that no increase in the height for a sign or fence may be granted nor may the variance result in an increase in the number of stories than would otherwise be allowed under the applicable zoning district. Said increase shall be limited to parapet walls or screening for roof-mounted mechanical equipment.

4.Landscape buffer.

A reduction in width by no more than 50 percent where the future land use map recommends a more compatible land use on the neighboring property than that for which said property is actually zoned, or in other situations where the intent of the required buffer can be equally or otherwise achieved.

Reduction of a buffer required as a condition of a rezoning or of a grant of a conditional use shall be not permitted.

5.Sidewalk.

An elimination and/or reduction of width of a required sidewalk pursuant to the following conditions:

a.The cost of the sidewalk installation exceeds 25% of the total project cost due to project scope as well as site factors, including, but not limited to, stormwater infrastructure, topography, and existing utilities;
b.In order to provide compatibility with existing conditions on adjacent properties;
c.In order to preserve existing trees and landscape materials in the landscape and sidewalk zone;
d.In order to provide continuity with planned public improvements; and
e.Lack of existing sidewalks in the general vicinity.
6.Demarcation of parking spaces.

Parking spaces may be left unmarked provided all of the following conditions are present:

a.The parking lot must be designated to serve only a multi-family residential project which is designed and intended for rental occupancy;
b.The parking lots must be designed in relation to the internal circulation system such that the areas reserved for parking are easily identified and clearly distinct from the interior driveways because of their location, design, orientation, or configuration, such as in parking areas with a single interior driveway having parking spaces located perpendicular to and along the sides of the access driveway, allowing the curbing to delineate the exterior dimension of the single parking bay; and
c.Approval for the elimination of the striping has been obtained by the applicant in writing from the City Engineer.
7.Sign variance.
a.The mere existence of a nonconforming sign or advertising device shall not constitute a valid reason to grant a variance. A variance may be granted in an individual case of extreme and unusual hardship, not self-imposed, and upon a finding by the UDO Administrator that the following conditions exist:
i.There exist extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the property in question resulting from its size, shape, or topography which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the area;
ii.A literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other similar properties in the city;
iii.Granting the variance requested will not confer upon the property of the applicant significant privileges which are denied to other similar properties in the city;
iv.The requested variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this chapter and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or to the general welfare.
v.The variance is not a request to permit a type of sign which otherwise is not permitted in the zoning districts involved;
vi.The cause for the need for the variance is not created by the applicant, the owner, lessor, or successor in ownership or occupancy;
vii.Signs may be displaced upon the vertical surface of a canopy only by a variance, upon the applicant reducing the number or square footage of ground or wall signs authorized by this chapter for the lot in question, so as to reasonably set-off for the additional signs.
b.All requests for such variances shall be in written form and filed with the UDO Administrator within 10 days of receiving a denied sign application. The UDO Administrator shall make a decision on a complete application within 30 days of the UDO Administrator 's receipt of the application and shall email the decision to the applicant at the email address shown on the application. The writing shall state the basis of the decision. An applicant dissatisfied with the UDO Administrator 's decision shall appeal to the city council pursuant to the appeal procedure at subsection 104.18.B.1.
c.No change may be made in the location, shape, color, height, size, copy or text of any sign subject to a variance unless the sign is brought into compliance with the provisions of this chapter and a sign permit is granted.
d.A change in the owner, lessor, lessee, or user of property served by a sign subject to a variance shall negate the variance, and the sign shall be removed or brought into compliance with the provisions of this chapter and a new sign permit granted.
e.A sign subject to a variance may not be reconstructed, replaced or reset if it is removed for any reason.
f.When a sign under a variance has been razed or damaged by any cause, naturally occurring or otherwise, the sign shall not be re-established:
i.If the value of the sign as damaged is 50 percent or less of the value of the signs prior to the damage; or
ii.If the estimated cost of repairing the above ground portion of the sign is more than the value of the sign in its damaged condition.
iii.Value shall be established by the UDO Administrator or his/her designee and shall be based upon the value of the sign's materials above ground with no allowance for the intrinsic value of the sign or the value of the right to have a sign at that location.
C.Approval of an administrative variance.
1.The applicant shall demonstrate, and the UDO Administrator shall find that all of the following criteria are present when approving a request for an adjustment:
a.There are clear and compelling reasons that are not purely financial demonstrating that the required standard cannot be met;
b.The modification is the minimum amount necessary to meet the objectives identified above; and
c.The requested adjustment will not contravene the public interests or negatively impact adjoining properties.
2.Application procedures.
a.Application form and documentation.

Refer to Sec. 104.8.B. of this UDO.

b.Standards and factors governing review of administrative variance applications The basis for approval or denial of a request for an administrative variance shall be whether the requested changes:
i.Meet, or fail to meet, the requirements of the UDO;
ii.Are consistent, or inconsistent, with applicable design guidelines;
iii.Are consistent, or inconsistent, with the intents or purposes of this UDO; or
iv.Would result in a development that is architecturally appropriate.

If the application is denied, the reasons for denial shall be provided in writing along with a notice that the applicant may file an appeal to the Mayor and City Council as identified herein.

§ 104.25

Certificates.

Sec. 104.25. Certificates.

A.Certificate of zoning compliance.
1.No building permit shall be issued for any construction, reconstruction or alteration of a structure unless the UDO Administrator has issued a certificate of zoning compliance for such construction, reconstruction or alteration. Such certificate shall be issued only when such use complies with all provisions of this UDO.
2.No existing structure or land may be used or occupied for any purpose or use for which it is not presently being used unless a certificate of compliance shall have been applied for and issued by the UDO Administrator. Such certificate shall be issued only when such proposed change of use complies with all provisions of this UDO.
B.Certificate of appropriateness.
1.The UDO Administrator shall have the authority to grant administrative certificate of appropriateness approval for minor architectural modifications as follow:
a.Repainting of an existing building to a similar color;
b.Revisions of window or door placement;
c.Replacement of awnings or installation of new awnings when utilizing two colors or less;
d.New construction of a deck or modifications to an existing deck; and
e.Paint colors for existing and infill residential development.
2.The basis for approval or denial of a request for the granting of an administrative certificate of appropriateness approval for minor architectural modifications shall be whether the requested changes:
a.Meet, or fail to meet, the requirements of the UDO;
b.Are consistent, or inconsistent, with applicable design guidelines;
c.Are consistent, or inconsistent, with the intents or purposes of this UDO; or
d.Would result in a development that is architecturally appropriate.
3.In deciding to approve or deny such an application, the UDO Administrator shall consult the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission at which prior approval took place, if applicable. If the application is denied, the reasons for denial shall be provided in writing to the applicant along with a notice that the applicant may file an application for a certificate of appropriateness to the Mayor and City Council as identified herein.

ARTICLE 5. NONCONFORMITIES.

§ 105.1

Intent.

Sec. 105.1. Intent.

1.Within the districts established by this UDO or amendments thereto that may be later adopted there exist certain lots, buildings, structures and uses of land which were lawful before this UDO was passed or amended, but which would not be prohibited, regulated or restricted under the new terms of this article.
2.It is the intent to permit these legal nonconformities to continue until they are removed, but not to encourage their survival. It is further the intent of this UDO that nonconforming uses shall not be enlarged upon, expanded nor extended, nor be used as a basis for additional structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the same district.
3.Variances of area, width, and yard requirements may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission where necessary and where such addition does not create an unusual neighborhood building type.
4.To undo hardship, nothing in this article shall be deemed to require a change in the plans, construction or designated use of any building on which actual construction was lawfully begun prior to the effective date of adoption or amendment of this article and upon which actual building construction has been diligently conducted.
5.Nothing in this article shall be interpreted as authorization for, or approval of, the continuance of the use of a structure or premises in violation of zoning regulation in effect at the time of adoption of this article.
§ 105.2

Nonconformities.

Sec. 105.2. Nonconformities.

A.Lots of record.

Where a lot of record in existence at the time of adoption or amendment of this article does not meet the minimum requirements for lot width or lot area, the lot of record may be used for any permitted use in the district in which the lot is located; provided, that any building or structure constructed on the lot complies with all other requirements for the zoning district. The nonconforming lot may also be used for conditional uses, if it meets all applicable requirements of this article for those uses.

1.Side yards may be reduced by the same percentage that the width of the lot bears to the minimum district requirement, subject to the following conditions:
a.The side yard in no instance shall be less than five feet; and
b.In no case shall the side yard setback on the side street of a corner lot be reduced from that required by the zoning district.
2.If two or more vacant lots of record or combination of lots and portions of lots of record, in existence at the time of the passage of this article, or an amendment thereto, with continuous frontage and under single ownership do not meet the requirements established for lot width or lot area, the lands involved shall be considered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this article, and no portion of that parcel shall be used or divided in a manner which diminishes compliance with lot width and area requirements established by this article.
B.Uses.
1.A nonconforming use shall not be enlarged or increased, nor extended to occupy a greater area of land than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this article.
2.The extension of a lawful nonconforming use throughout all portions of a building or structure existing at the effective date of this article and which was designed to house the same use as the nonconforming use occupying the other portion of the building or structure shall not be considered as an extension of a nonconforming use.
3.No part of any nonconforming use shall be moved unless that movement eliminates or reduces the nonconformity. If a nonconforming use is abandoned for any reason for a period of more than 12 months, any subsequent use shall conform to the requirements of this article. A nonconforming use shall be determined to be abandoned if one or more of the following conditions exists, and which shall be deemed to constitute an intent on the part of the property owner to abandon the nonconforming use:
a.Utilities, such as water, gas and electricity to the property, have been disconnected;
b.The property, buildings, and grounds have fallen into disrepair;
c.Signs or other indications of the existence of the nonconforming use have been removed;
d.Equipment or fixtures necessary for the operation of the nonconforming use have been removed; or
e.Other actions which, in the opinion of the UDO Administrator, constitute an intention on the part of the property owner or lessee to abandon the nonconforming use.
4.A nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use provided all of the following determinations are made by the UDO Administrator:
a.The proposed use shall be as, or more, compatible with the surrounding neighborhood than the previous nonconforming use, considering factors such as hours of operation, traffic, noise and similar external impacts;
b.The proposed nonconforming use shall not be enlarged or increased, nor extended to occupy a greater area of land or building area than the previous nonconforming use; and
c.Appropriate conditions and safeguards are provided that will ensure compliance with the intent and purpose of this article.
5.A nonconforming use which is changed to a conforming use or to another nonconforming use of a more restrictive classification shall not be permitted to revert to the original or less restrictive use.
6.Uses consisting of lots occupied by storage yards, used car lots, golf driving ranges, miniature golf courses, and similar open uses, where the only buildings on the property are ancillary to the open use and where the use is nonconforming, shall be subject to the following restrictions, in addition to all other applicable provisions of this article:
a.When a nonconforming open use of land has been changed to a conforming use, it shall not be used again for any other nonconforming use;
b.Nonconforming open uses of land shall only be converted to a conforming use;
c.A nonconforming open use of land shall not be enlarged to cover more land than was occupied by that use when it became nonconforming;
d.When any nonconforming open use of land is discontinued for a period of more than six months, any future use of the land shall be limited to those uses permitted in the zoning district under which the property is governed. Vacancy and/or non-use of the land, regardless of the intent of the owner or tenant, shall constitute discontinuance under this provision.
C.Buildings or structures.

Where a lawful building or structure exists at the effective date of this article, or an amendment thereto, that does not comply with the requirements of this article because of restrictions such as lot coverage, height, setbacks, parking, or floor area, that building or structure may continue to be occupied and used so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions:

1.No nonconforming building or structure may be enlarged or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity, except in cases in which the setback of a building or structure is nonconforming by 50 percent or less of the distance required by this article. In such cases, the building may be extended along the same plane as the existing nonconforming setback, provided that in so doing, the setback itself is not further reduced.
2.In the event that a nonconforming building or structure is destroyed to an extent of more than 50 percent of its replacement value, exclusive of the foundation, it shall be reconstructed only in conformity with the provisions of this article; provided, the Mayor and City Council may, upon application, permit the reconstruction of the nonconforming building or structure if all of the following conditions are met:
a.The prior nonconforming condition(s) shall not be increased;
b.All building materials and architectural details shall conform to the applicable requirements of this article;
c.The new building or structure shall be placed on the original foundation, unless the building or structure could be located in a way that reduces the extent of its nonconformity on the lot;
d.The application to reconstruct the nonconforming building or structure shall be filed with the UDO Administrator within six months of the event in which the building or structure was damaged or destroyed;
e.The reconstruction of the building or structure shall not be detrimental to adjacent property and the surrounding neighborhood; and
f.If a nonconforming building or structure is moved for any reason and for any distance, it shall be moved to a location which complies with the requirements of this article.
D.Signs.
1.The lawful use of a permanent sign existing at the time of the adoption of this UDO is derived may be continued in non-conformance with the requirement of this UDO, except that the nonconforming sign shall not be enlarged, altered, modified, improved or rebuilt. However:
a.A nonconforming sign may be repaired to the extent necessary to maintain it in a safe condition and neat and orderly appearance;
b.A change in the advertising message on the sign shall not constitute an alteration or modification of the sign; or,
c.Routine maintenance and changing of copy shall be permitted as long as such maintenance or changing of copy does not result in or change the shape, size or design.
2.No structural repair or change in shape, size or design, shall be permitted except to make a nonconforming sign comply with all requirements of this chapter or to render the sign structurally sound.
3.A nonconforming sign may not be removed by an act of the owner and later replaced by another nonconforming sign.
4.No sign variances for a nonconforming sign are allowed.
§ 105.3

Uses approved under prior special exception permits or

Sec. 105.3 Uses approved under prior special exception permits or rezoning with conditions.

Any use for which a special exception or a rezoning with conditions has been issued under a prior zoning code or ordinance shall not be deemed a nonconforming use but shall be deemed a conforming use in the district under the conditions required for the issuance and validity of the special use permit or rezoning.

§ 105.4

Amortization.

Sec. 105.4. Amortization.

Certain uses of land, buildings, and structures have an adverse effect on the orderly development of the community and on the general health and welfare of the citizens. Such uses can be required to cease after a reasonable time, irrespective of the general rules governing nonconforming uses as presented in this article.

The following uses shall be removed, discontinued, or made conforming within the specified amortization period which shall commence upon the serving of written notice to the owner by the city:

1.Fences, walls and foliage which, in the opinion of the UDO Administrator, constitute a hazard by virtue of impairing sight distances at a curve or intersection shall be made conforming within 90 days.
2.Nonconforming open storage operations, such as truck parking, automobile wrecking or salvage, salvage material storage, junk yards, and similar uses shall be made conforming within two calendar years.
3.Manufactured home communities shall be brought into compliance within three calendar years.
§ 105.5

Repairs and maintenance.

Sec. 105.5. Repairs and maintenance.

Work may be done on any nonconforming structure, or portion of a structure, containing a nonconforming use, on ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of load bearing or non-bearing walls, fixtures, wiring, or plumbing, to an extent not exceeding fifty percent of the current replacement cost of the nonconforming structure or on conforming portion of the structure as the case may be, provided that the square footage or cubic content existing when it became nonconforming shall not be increased.

If a nonconforming structure or portion of a structure containing a nonconforming use becomes physically unsafe or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance and is declared by any duly authorized official to be unsafe or unlawful by reason of physical condition, it shall not thereafter be restored, repaired or rebuilt except in conformity with the regulations of the district in which it is located.

Nothing in this UDO shall be deemed to prevent the strengthening or restoring to a safe condition of any building or part thereof declared to be unsafe by any official charged with protecting the public safety, upon order of such official.

§ 105.6

Exceptions.

Sec. 105.6. Exceptions.

A.Front yard requirements.
1.The front yard requirements of this chapter shall not apply on any lot where the average depth of the front yards of existing buildings on adjoining lots located wholly or in part within 100 feet on each side of such lot within the same block and zoning district and fronting on the same side of the street is either greater or less than the minimum required front yard depth.
2.If the average depth of the front yards is greater than the required minimum front yard depth, the depth of the front yard of such lot shall be the average of the front yards of such buildings but need not be greater than 150 percent of the required front yard depth.
3.If the average depth of the front yards is less than the required minimum front yard depth, the depth of the front yard of such lot may be less than the required front yard depth but shall not be less than the average of the front yards of such buildings.
B.Structures not completed or finished.

If a permitted construction project remains dormant for more than 12 months, the building permit and all other permits shall become null and void. The owner of such uncompleted structure may maintain the structure in its existing condition for up to 12 months while awaiting new permits. If the applicant does not receive the necessary permits within the 12-month period, the uncompleted structure shall be removed. The Mayor and City Council may grant one extension of up to 12 additional months where it is found that circumstances beyond the owner’s control such as extreme weather conditions, availability of materials, or labor shortages have caused delays.

C.Errors and violations.

The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans or specifications shall not be considered as approval for any violation of any provision in this article. No permit presuming to give the authority to violate or cancel any provision of this article shall be valid.

D.Illegal nonconformity.

Any lot, use, building or structure established in violation of the provisions of this article or any prior ordinance or amendment shall not be considered a legal nonconformity and shall not be entitled to the provisions, remedies and safeguards of this article.

E.Wireless telecommunications facility.
1.Any pre-existing antenna, tower, or telecommunication facility which does not meet the requirements of this article shall be considered nonconforming and subject to the provisions of this article.

However, the installation of a new antenna on an existing tower shall be permitted; provided, it does not result in modifications to the structure or height of the existing tower or necessitate the addition of other accessory buildings or equipment.

a.A nonconforming sign may be repaired to the extent necessary to maintain it in a safe condition and neat and orderly appearance;
b.A change in the advertising message on the sign shall not constitute an alteration or modification of the sign; or,
c.Routine maintenance and changing of copy shall be permitted as long as such maintenance or changing of copy does not result in or change the shape, size or design.
2.No structural repair or change in shape, size or design, shall be permitted except to make a nonconforming sign comply with all requirements of this chapter or to render the sign structurally sound.
3.A nonconforming sign may not be removed by an act of the owner and later replaced by another nonconforming sign.
4.No sign variances for a nonconforming sign are allowed.