342.01. Intent
This Code Section is designed and intended to balance the interests of the residents of the City of Duluth, telecommunications providers, and telecommunications customers in the siting of wireless facilities and support structures within the City of Duluth so as to protect the health, safety and integrity of residential neighborhoods and foster, through appropriate zoning and land use controls, a competitive environment for telecommunications carriers that does not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services and shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services, and so as to promote the City of Duluth as a proactive city in the availability of wireless telecommunications service.
342.02. Purposes
a.Provide for the appropriate location and development of wireless facilities and support structures to serve the residents and businesses of the City of Duluth;
b.Protect the City of Duluth’s built and natural environment by promoting compatible standards for wireless facilities and support structures;
c.Minimize adverse visual impacts of wireless facilities and support structures through careful design, siting, landscape screening and innovative camouflaging techniques;
d.Avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from wireless facility and support structure failure through engineering and careful siting of wireless facilities and support structures;
e.Maximize use of any new and existing wireless support structures (towers) so as to minimize the need to construct new towers and minimize the total number of towers throughout the City;
f.Maximize and encourage use of alternative telecommunication tower structures as a primary option rather than construction of additional single-use towers;
g.Encourage and promote the location of new wireless facilities and support structures in areas which are not zoned for residential use;
342.03. Exemptions
The following shall be exempt from this Code Section:
a.Any wireless facilities and support structures under 70 feet in total height and owned and operated by an amateur radio operator licensed by the Federal Communications Commission.
b.Any wireless facilities or support structures located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by the City of Duluth, provided a license or lease authorizing a wireless telecommunications facility has been approved by the governing body.
c.Any wireless facilities and support structures for which a permit has been properly issued prior to the effective date of this Code (and is current and not expired), with the exception that any modifications or collocation proposed after issuance of the initial permit shall be reviewed and processed in accordance with this Code Section.
342.04. Collocation; Availability of Suitable Existing Structures
No new wireless support structure (tower) shall be allowed unless the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department and the City Council that no existing tower or existing alternative tower structure (clock towers, bell towers, church steeples, light/power poles, electric transmission towers, manmade trees, and similar natural or manmade alternative-design mounting structures that camouflage or conceal the presence of antennas or towers) can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless facilities. All evidence submitted shall be signed and sealed by appropriate licensed professionals or qualified industry experts.
Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the proposed antenna shall consist of the following:
a.That no existing towers or suitable alternative tower structures are located within the geographic antennas placement area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements.
b.That existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements.
c.That existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's antenna and related equipment.
d.That the applicant's proposed antenna(s) would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna(s)
on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna.
e.That the cost or contractual provisions required by the tower owner to share an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable.
f.That the applicant adequately demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that existing towers and structures unsuitable.
342.05. Allowed Zoning Districts
a.If it is adequately demonstrated that antenna collocation, as required in this Section, is not possible for a given geographic antenna placement area, constructing a new tower, including placement of additional buildings or other supporting equipment used in connection with said tower or antenna, may be allowed in the following zoning districts upon Special Use approval by City Council: M-1, M-2, C-1, C-2, HC-Retail, HC-Auto, PUD, O-I and RA-200.
b.Collocation, as described in Section Sec. 342.04, shall be allowed in the following zoning districts: M-1, M-2, C-1, C-2, HC-Retail, HC-Auto, PUD, O-I and RA-200.
342.06. Principal, Accessory and Joint Uses
a.Accessory structures used in direct support of a tower shall be allowed but not be used for offices, vehicle storage or other outdoor storage. Mobile or immobile equipment not used in direct support of a tower facility shall not be stored or parked on the site of the tower.
b.Towers may be located on sites containing another principal use in the same buildable area. Joint use of a site is prohibited when a proposed or existing principal use includes the storage, distribution or sale of volatile, flammable, explosive or hazardous materials such as propane, gasoline, natural gas and dangerous chemicals.
c.Placement of more than one tower on a lot shall be permitted, provided requirements from this section are met along with all setback, design, and landscape requirements as to each tower. Structures may be located as close to each other as technically feasible, provided tower failure characteristics of the towers on the site will not lead to multiple failures in the event that one fails.
342.07. General Requirements
The requirements set forth in this Code Section shall govern the location and construction of all wireless facilities and support structures governed by this Code.
a.Building Codes and Safety Standards. To ensure the structural integrity of wireless facilities and support structures, the owner of such a facility and structure shall ensure that it is maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable local building codes and the applicable standards for such wireless facilities and support structures are published by the FCC as amended from time to time. The owner shall also conduct periodic inspections of such facilities at least once every three years to ensure structural integrity. Inspections shall be conducted by a Georgia licensed structural engineer. The results of such inspection shall be provided to the Planning and Development Director.
b.Regulatory Compliance. All wireless facilities and support structures must meet or exceed current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC and any other agency of the state or federal government with the authority to regulate wireless facilities and structures. If such standards and regulations are changed then the owners of the facilities and structures governed by this Code Section shall bring such communications facilities and structures into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within the date established by the agency promulgating the standards or regulations.
c.Security. All wireless support structures shall be enclosed by decay-resistant security fencing not less than 6 feet in height and shall be equipped with an appropriate anti-climbing device. This requirement may be waived by the Planning and Development Director if it is deemed that this would produce negative visual clutter or obstruct a view corridor.
d.Lighting. No illumination is permitted on wireless facilities or support structures unless part of an approved public lighting program or required by the FCC, FAA or other state or federal agency of competent jurisdiction in which case the Planning and Development Director may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding uses and views.
e.Advertising. No advertising is permitted on wireless facilities or support structures.
f.Visual Impact.
1.Site location and development shall preserve the Illustrative example of wireless pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings tower camouflaged as a tree and land uses and the zone district as much as possible. Towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical (i.e.
camouflaging through integration with structures or appearance such as artificial trees, etc.).
2.Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area.
3.At a tower site the design of the buildings and related structures shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment (i.e. artificial tree appearance, steeples, decorative fencing, etc.).
4.Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or other applicable federal or state agency, be painted a neutral color, so as to reduce visual obtrusiveness.
5.If an antenna is installed on a structure other than a tower and is generally visible to the public, the antenna and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment must be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. Roof mounted antennas shall be made visually unobtrusive by screening to match existing air conditioning units, stairs, elevator towers or other background.
6.Antennas mounted on architecturally significant structures or significant architectural details of the building shall be covered by appropriate casings that are manufactured to match existing architectural features found on the building.
7.Where feasible, antennas can be placed directly above, below or incorporated with vertical design elements of a building to help in camouflaging.
8.Towers or roof mounted antennas shall not be placed in direct line with significant view corridors, as designated by the City of Duluth or by any state or federal law or agency. For purposes of this Code Section a significant view corridor shall be defined as an area to be kept free of obstructions or structures that interfere with the view of any scenic area, historic building or area. A view corridor shall be established by ordinance of the City of Duluth by zoning restrictions adopted in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Duluth, or by any state or federal law or agency in accordance with provisions of federal laws or duly adopted regulations.
9.Any equipment shelter or cabinet must be concealed from public view or made compatible with the architecture of the surrounding structures or placed underground. Equipment compounds shall be screened from public view and may use landscaping or materials and colors consistent with the surrounding structures. The shelter or cabinet must be regularly maintained.
g.Landscaping.
1.Landscaping shall be used to effectively screen the view of the equipment compound from adjacent public ways, public property and residential property.
2.Native vegetation on the site shall be preserved to the greatest practical extent. The applicant shall provide a site plan showing existing significant vegetation to be removed and vegetation to be replanted.
3.The Planning and Development Director may waive or modify the landscaping requirement where lesser requirements are desirable for adequate visibility for security purposes or for continued operation of existing bona fide agricultural or forest uses such as farms, nurseries and tree farms. In certain locations where the visual impact of the tower would be minimal, such as remote agricultural or rural locations or developed heavy industrial areas, the landscaping requirement may be modified or waived by the Planning and Development Director.
h.Lot Size and Setbacks. The site shall be of a size and shape sufficient to provide an adequate setback from the base of the tower to any property line abutting a residential district, public property, or public street.
Such setback shall be sufficient to:
1.Provide for an adequate vegetative, topographic or other buffer as required.
2.Preserve the privacy of surrounding residential property.
3.Protect adjoining property from the potential impact of tower failure by being large enough to accommodate such failure on the site, based on the required engineer’s analysis.
4.When a tower is adjacent to a residential use, it must be set back from the nearest residential lot line a distance at least equal to its total height.
5.Towers greater than 70 feet in height shall not be located any closer than 1,500 feet from an existing tower unless technologically required or visually preferable as determined by the City Council through a Special Use approval request.
6.Setbacks for towers 70 feet and less shall not be closer to a residential structure than the height of the tower or closer to a residential property line than 40 feet.
342.08. Special Use Approval
a.Special use approval shall be required to:
1.Construct a new tower in an allowed district; or
2.Modify or accept a collocation to a previously approved wireless facility or support structure (tower) when the proposed modification of collocation:
i.Increases the overall height or width of the support structure to which the wireless facilities are to be attached; or
ii.Increases the dimensions of the equipment compound that was initially approved by the City.
b.Application. In addition to the special use review and approval requirements found in the Procedures and Permits Article of this Development Code, the following process shall apply:
1.An application shall be submitted that includes the following information:
i.Site plan(s) to scale specifying the location of telecommunications facilities, transmission building and/or other accessory uses, access, parking, fences, landscaped areas and adjacent land uses.
ii.Landscape plan to scale indicating size, spacing and type of plantings required in this Code Section.
iii.An impact statement fully describing the effects that the proposed telecommunications facility will have on the environment and surrounding area including the impacts on adjacent residential structures and districts, impacts on structures and sites of historic significance and impacts on streetscapes and significant view corridors. The Impact Statement shall include a description of anticipated maintenance needs for the telecommunications facility, including frequency of service, personnel needs, equipment needs and traffic noise or safety impacts of such maintenance.
iv.Report from a professional structural engineer licensed in the State of Georgia, documenting the following:
1.Telecommunications facility height and design, including technical, engineering, economic and other pertinent factors governing selection of the proposed design.
2.Total anticipated capacity of the telecommunications facility, including number and types of antennae which can be accommodated. Evidence shall be provided that indicates capacity is sufficient to allow future wireless facilities (collocation).
3.Evidence of structural integrity of the tower structure (i.e. engineer’s statement that structure is built to meet or exceed Standard Building Code).
4.Structural failure characteristics of the telecommunications tower(s) over 70 feet and demonstration that site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain debris.
5.A definition of the area of service to be served by the antenna or tower and whether such antenna or tower is needed for coverage or capacity.
v.The identity of a community liaison officer to resolve issues of concern to neighbors and residents relating to the construction and operation of the facility. Include name, address, telephone number, facsimile number and electronic mail address, if applicable.
vi.The existing towers and tall structures located within the geographic service area should be identified on a map along with written justification as to the need for a new tower in place of an existing structure
vii.A map indicating all existing towers and antennae sites located within Duluth and within 2 miles of the city boundaries.
c.Review Period.
1.Within 150 calendar days of the date an application for special use approval is filed with the Planning and Development Department, unless another date is specified in a written agreement between the Department and the applicant, the City shall:
i.Make its final decision to approve or disapprove the application; and
ii.Advise the applicant in writing of its final decision.
2.Within 30 calendar days of the date an application for special use approval is filed with the Planning and Development Department, the Planning and Development Director shall determine if it is a complete application and, if he or she determines the application is not a complete application, notify the applicant in writing of any information required to complete such application.
3.To the extent additional information is required to complete the application, the time required by the applicant to provide such information shall not be counted toward the calendar day review period set forth in Sec. 342.08(c)(1) above.
342.09. Administrative Review
a.Uses Allowed by Administrative Approval.
1.Modification or Collocation, Wireless Facility or Support Structure. A proposed modification or collocation to a previously approved wireless facility or support structure, with the exception of proposals meeting the criteria below, may be approved by the Planning and Development Department after conducting an administrative review if the proposed modification or collocation does not increase the overall height or width of the support structure to which the wireless facilities are to be attached or increase the dimensions of the equipment compound that was initially approved by the City.
i.Review Period.
1.Within 90 calendar days of the date an application for a modification or collocation meeting the criteria is filed with the Planning and Development Department, unless another date is specified in a written agreement between the Department and the applicant, the City shall make its final decision to approve or disapprove the application and advise the applicant in writing of its final decision.
2.Within 30 calendar days of the date an application for modification or collocation meeting the criteria is filed with the Planning and Development Department, the Planning and Development Director shall determine if it is a complete application and, if he or she determines the application is not a complete application, notify the applicant in writing of any information required to complete such application.
3.To the extent additional information is required to complete the application, the time required by the applicant to provide such information shall not be counted toward the 90-calendar day review period set forth above.
2.Modification, Base Station or Tower. For a proposed modification of an existing base station or tower that does not “substantially change”, as defined in the Interpretation and Definitions Article of this Development Code, the physical dimensions of such tower or base station, the process outlined below shall apply.
i.Within 60 days of the date on which an applicant submits a request seeking approval under this Section, the Planning and Development Director may approve the application unless it determines that the application is not covered by this subsection.
ii.The 60-day period begins to run when the application is filed and may be stopped only by mutual agreement or in cases where the Planning and Development Department determines that the application is incomplete. The timeframe for review is not stopped by a moratorium on the review of applications.
iii.To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the Planning and Development Department must provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, clearly and specifically delineating all missing documents or information. Such information does not require documentation intended to illustrate the need for such wireless facilities or to justify the business decision to modify such wireless facilities.
iv.The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the Planning and Development Department’s notice of incompleteness.
v.Following a supplemental submission, Planning and Development Department will have 10 days to notify the applicant that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in Subsection (2) above. Second or subsequent notices of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that were not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.
342.10. Maintenance Impacts
Equipment at a transmission facility shall be automated to the greatest extent possible to reduce traffic and congestion. Where the site abuts or has access to a collector and to a local street, access for maintenance vehicles shall be exclusively by means of the collector street. Access drives and maintenance vehicle parking shall be paved unless the requirement is waived by the Planning and Development Director.
342.11. Nuisances
Telecommunications facilities, including; (without limitation), power source, ventilation and cooling, shall be operated at all times within the limits of the City of Duluth Noise Ordinance, shall not be operated so as to cause the generation of heat that adversely affects a building occupant and shall not be maintained or operated in such a manner as to be a nuisance.
342.12. Removal of Antennae and Towers
All telecommunications facilities shall be maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable building and technical codes so as to ensure the structural integrity of such facilities. If upon inspection by the Planning and Development Director or his designee any such telecommunications facility is determined not to comply with the minimum Standard Building Code or to constitute a danger to persons or property, then upon notice being provided to the owner of the facility and the owner of the property if such owner is different, such owners shall have 30 days to bring such facility into compliance. In the event such telecommunications facility is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the City may provide notice to the owners requiring the telecommunications facility to be removed. In the event such telecommunications facility is not removed within 30 days of receipt of such notice, the City may remove such facility and place a lien upon the property for the costs of removal or seek costs incurred through court action. Delay by the City in taking action shall not in any way waive the City’s right to take action. The City may pursue all legal remedies available to it to ensure that telecommunications facilities not in compliance with the minimum Standard Building Code standards or which constitute a danger to persons or property are brought into compliance or removed. The City may seek to have the telecommunications facility removed regardless of the owners or operators intent to operate the tower or antenna and regardless of any permits, federal, state or otherwise, which may have been granted.
342.13. Abandoned Towers
a.Any telecommunications facility that is not operated for a continuous period of 12 months shall be considered abandoned, whether or not the owner or operator intends to make use of it or any part of it.
The owner of a telecommunications facility and the owner of the property where the facility is located shall be under a duty to remove the abandoned telecommunications facility. If such antenna and/or tower is not removed within 60 days of receipt of notice from the City notifying the owner(s) of such abandonment, the City may remove such tower and/or antenna and place a lien upon the property for any removal cost(s) incurred or seek costs incurred through court action. The City may pursue all legal remedies available to it to ensure that abandoned telecommunications facilities are removed. Delay by the City in taking action shall not in any way waive the City’s right to take action. The City may seek to have the telecommunications facility removed regardless of the owners or operators’ intent to operate the tower or antenna and regardless of any permits, federal, state or otherwise, which may have been granted.
b.If the owner of an abandoned tower or antenna wishes to use such abandoned tower or antenna, the owner first must apply for and receive all applicable permits and meet all of the conditions of this Article as if such tower or antenna were a new tower or antenna.
342.14. Small Cell Wireless Facility
a.Intent
1.This Code Section is designed to implement the Georgia Streamlining Wireless Facilities and Antennas Act., O.C.G.A. Title 36, Chapter 66C. The provisions address placement of small cell facilities and associated poles in the public rights of way. The GMA’s Model Right of Way Ordinance, available to local governments in the GMA Telecommunications and Right of Way Management program, addresses other conditions regarding the access and use of the right of way that are not specific to small cell facilities and associated poles.
b.Purpose and Compliance
1.O.C.G.A. § 32-4-92(a)(10) authorizes the City of Duluth, Georgia (the “City”) to establish reasonable regulations for the installation, construction, maintenance, renewal, removal, and relocation of pipes, mains, conduits, cables, wires, poles, towers, traffic and other signals, and other equipment, facilities, or appliances in, on, along, over, or under the public roads of the City.
Further, 47 U.S.C. § 253(c) provides that the City has authority to manage its public rights of way.
Finally, the Georgia Streamlining Wireless Facilities and Antennas Act., O.C.G.A. Title 36, Chapter 66C (the “SWFAA”), addresses the placement of small wire-less facilities in the public rights of way of the City.
2.The City finds it is in the best interest of the City and its residents and businesses to establish requirements, specifications and reasonable conditions regarding placement of small wireless facilities, and poles in the public rights of way. These requirements, specifications and conditions are adopted in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents and businesses of the City and to reasonably manage and protect the public rights of way and its uses in the City.
3.The objective of Section 342.14 is to (i) implement the SWFAA and (ii) ensure use of the public rights of way is consistent with the design, appearance and other features of nearby land uses, protects the integrity of historic, cultural and scenic resources and does not harm residents’
quality of life.
c.Definitions
1.Unless defined within this Ordinance, terms used in Section 342.14 shall have the meanings given them in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-2.
2.In the event that any federal or state law containing definitions used in Section 342.14 is amended, the definition in the referenced section, as amended, shall control.
3.Definitions in Section 342.14 include references and citations to applicable federal and state laws. In the event that any referenced section is amended, the definition in the referenced section, as amended, shall control.
d.Permits
1.A permit is required to collocate a small wireless facility in the public right of way or to in-stall, modify, or replace a pole or a decorative pole in the public right of way. A permit is not required to perform the activities described in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-6(e) or (f).
2.Any person seeking to collocate a small wireless facility in the public right of way or to in-stall, modify, or replace a pole or a decorative pole in the public right of way shall submit an application to the Department of Planning and Development for a permit. Applications are available from the Department of Planning and Development. Any material change to information contained in an application shall be submitted in writing to the Department of Planning and Development within 30 days after the events necessitating the change.
3.Each application for a permit shall include the maximum application fees permitted under O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3). Such maximum application fees shall automatically increase on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2021, as provided under O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(b).
4.The Department of Planning and Development shall review applications for permits according to the timelines and using the procedures identified in O.C.G.A. §§ 36-66C-7 and 36-66C-13.
5.Applications for permits shall be approved except as follows:
i.In order to receive a permit to install a pole or replace a decorative pole, the applicant must have determined after diligent investigation that it cannot meet the service objectives of the permit by collocating on an existing pole or support structure on which:
1.The applicant has the right to collocate subject to reasonable terms and conditions; and
2.Such collocation would not impose technical limitations or significant additional costs. The applicant shall certify that it has made such a determination in good faith, based on the assessment of a licensed engineer, and shall provide a written summary of the basis for such determination.
The Department of Planning and Development may deny an application for a permit upon any of the conditions identified in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(j). For applications for new poles in the public right of way in areas zoned for residential use, the Department of Planning and Development may propose an alternate location in the public right of way within 100 feet of the location set forth in the application, and the wireless provider shall use the Department of Planning and Development proposed alternate location unless the location imposes technical limits or significant additional costs. The wireless provider shall certify that it has made such a determination in good faith, based on the assessment of a licensed engineer, and it shall provide a written summary of the basis for such determination.
6.A permit issued under Section 342.14(d) shall authorize such person to occupy the public rights of way to: (i) collocate a small wireless facility on or adjacent to a pole or a support structure that does not exceed the limitations set forth in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(h)(3) or on or adjacent to a decorative pole in compliance with O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-12; and (ii) install, modify, or replace a pole or decorative pole for collocation of a small wireless facility that does not exceed the limitations set forth in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(h)(1) and (h)(2).
7.Upon the issuance of a permit under this Code, and on each anniversary of such issuance, every person issued a permit shall submit to the City the maximum annual payments permitted under O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(a)(4) and (a)(5); provided, however, that if such person removes its small wireless facilities form the public rights of way pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(e), then such person shall be responsible for the pro rata portion of the annual payment based on the number of days of occupation since the last annual payment. Upon making such pro rata payment and removal of the small wireless facilities, the person’s annual payment obligations under this section shall cease as of the date of the actual removal. The maximum annual payments shall automatically increase on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2021, as provided under O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(b).
8.Any person issued a permit shall pay the fees identified in O.C.G.A. § 36- 66C-5(a)(6) and (a)(7), as applicable.
9.The City may revoke a permit issued pursuant to Section 342.14(d) if the wireless provider or its equipment placed in the public right of way under that permit subsequently is not in compliance with any provision of this Code or the Georgia Streamlining Wireless Facilities and Antennas Act.
Upon revocation, the City may proceed according to Section 342.14(d)(10).
10.If a wireless provider occupies the public rights of way without obtaining a permit required by Section 342.14(d) or without complying with the SWFAA, then the City may, at the sole discretion of the City, restore the right of way, to the extent practicable in the reasonable judgment of the City, to its condition prior to the unpermitted collocation or installation and to charge the responsible wireless provider the reasonable, documented cost of the City in doing so, plus a penalty not to exceed $1,000.00. The City may suspend the ability of the wireless provider to receive any new permits from the City under Section 342.14(d) until the wireless provider has paid the amount assessed for such restoration costs and the penalty assessed, if any; provided, however, that the City may not suspend such ability of any applicant that has deposited the amount in controversy in escrow pending an adjudication of the merits of the dispute by a court of competent jurisdiction.
11.All accepted applications for permits shall be publicly available subject to the limitations identified in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-6(c).
12.An applicant may file a consolidated application related to multiple small wireless facilities, poles or decorative poles so long as such consolidated application meets the requirements of O.C.G.A.
§ 36-66C-13.
13.Activities authorized under a permit shall be completed within the timelines provided in O.C.G.A.
§ 36-66C-7(k)(2).
14.Issuance of a permit authorizes the applicant to: (i) undertake the collocation, installation, modification or replacement approved by the permit and (ii) operate and maintain the small wireless facilities and any associated pole covered by the permit for a period of 10 years.
15.Permits shall be renewed following the expiration of the term identified in Section 342.14(d)(14)
upon the terms and conditions identified in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(k)(2)(B).
16.If an application for a permit seeks to collocate small wireless facilities on city-owned poles in the public rights of way, then the City shall, within 60-days of receipt of the completed application: (i) provide a good faith estimate for any make-ready work necessary to enable the authority pole to support the proposed facility; or (ii) notify the wireless provider that the wireless provider will be required to perform the make-ready work. Any make-ready work performed by the City shall be completed pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(n).
e.Removal; Relocation; Reconditioning; Replacement; Abandonment
1.An Utility may remove its small wireless facilities from the public rights of according to the procedures of O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-5(e).
2.In the event of a removal under Section 342.14(e)(1), the right of way shall be, to the extent practicable in the reasonable judgment of the City, restored to its condition prior to the removal.
If a utility owner fails to return the right of way, to the extent practicable in the reasonable judgment of the City, to its condition prior to the removal within 90 days of the removal, the City may, at the sole discretion of the City, restore the right of way to such condition and charge the utility owner the City’s reasonable, documented cost of removal and restoration, plus a penalty not to exceed $500.00. The City may suspend the ability of the person to receive any new permits under Section 342.14(d) until the utility owner has paid the amount assessed for such restoration costs and the penalty assessed, if any; provided, however, that the City will not suspend such ability of any utility owner that has deposited the amount in controversy in escrow pending an adjudication of the merits of the dispute by a court of competent jurisdiction.
3.If, in the reasonable exercise of police powers, the City determines: (i) a pole or support structure unreasonably interferes with the widening, repair, reconstruction, or relocation of a public road or highway, or (ii) relocation of poles, support structures, or small wireless facilities is required as a result of a public project, the wireless provider shall relocate such poles, support structures, or small wireless facilities pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(l). If the wireless provider fails to relocate a pole, support structure or small wireless facility or fails to provide a written good faith estimate of the time needed to relocate the pole, support structure or small wireless within the time period prescribed in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(l), the City make take the actions authorized by O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(o), in addition to any other powers under applicable law.
4.The City shall recondition and replace city-owned poles consistent with the provisions of O.C.G.A.
§ 36-66C-7(m). Wireless providers shall accommodate and cooperate with reconditioning and replacement consistent with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36- 66C-7(m).
5.A wireless provider must notify the City of its decision to abandon any small wireless facility, support structure or pole pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(p)(1). The wireless provider shall perform all acts and duties identified in O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(p) regarding abandonment. The City may take all actions and exercise all powers authorized under O.C.G.A. § 36-66C-7(p) upon abandonment, in addition to any other powers under applicable law.
f.Standards
1.Small wireless facilities and new, modified, or replacement poles to be used for collocation of small wireless facilities may be placed in the public right of way as a permitted use: (i) upon a receipt of a permit under Section 342.14(d); (ii) subject to applicable codes; and (iii) so long as such small wireless facilities and new, modified, or replacement poles to be used for collocation of small wireless facilities comply with the appropriate provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36- 66C-7(h).
i.New, modified, or replacement poles installed in the right of way in a historic district and in an area zoned primarily for residential use shall not exceed 50 feet above ground level.
ii.Each new, modified, or replacement pole installed in the right of way that is not in a historic district or in an area zoned primarily for residential use shall not exceed the greater of:
1.Fifty feet above ground level; or
2.Ten feet greater in height above ground level than the tallest existing pole in the same public right of way in place as of January 1, 2019, and located within 500 feet of the new proposed pole;
iii.New small wireless facilities in the public right of way and collocated on an existing pole or support structure shall not exceed more than ten feet above the existing pole or support structure.
iv.New small wireless facilities in the public right of way collocated on a new or replacement pole under Section 342.14(f)(1)(a) or Section 342.14(f)(1)(b) may not extend above the top of such poles.
2.A decorative pole should only be located where an existing pole can be removed and replaced, or at a new location where the City has identified that a streetlight is necessary.
3.Unless it is determined that another design is less intrusive, or placement is required under applicable law, small wireless facilities shall be concealed as follows:
i.Antennas located at the top of poles and support structures shall be incorporated into the pole or support structure, or placed within shrouds of a size such that the antenna appears to be part of the pole or support structure;
ii.Antennas placed elsewhere on a pole or support structure shall be integrated into the pole or support structure or be designed and placed to minimize visual impacts.
iii.Radio units or equipment cabinets holding radio units and mounted on a pole shall be placed as high as possible, located to avoid interfering with, or creating any hazard to any other use of the public rights of way, and located on one side of the pole. Unless the radio units or equipment cabinets can be concealed by appropriate traffic signage, radio units or equipment cabinets mounted below the communications space on poles shall be designed so that the largest dimension is vertical, and the width is such that the radio units or equipment cabinets are minimally visible from the opposite side of the pole on which they are placed.
iv.Wiring and cabling shall be neat and concealed within or flush to the pole or support structure, ensuring concealment of these components to the greatest extent possible.
4.Notwithstanding any provision of this Code Section to the contrary, an applicant may collocate a small wireless facility within a historic district and may place or replace a pole within a historic district, only upon satisfaction of the following: (i) issuance of a permit under Section 342.14(d) and (ii) compliance with applicable codes.
5.Notwithstanding any provision of this Code Section to the contrary, an applicant may collocate a small wireless facility on a decorative pole, or may replace a decorative pole with a new decorative pole, in the event the existing decorative pole will not structurally support the attachment, only upon satisfaction of the following: (i) issuance of a permit under Section 342.14(d) and (ii) compliance with applicable codes.
g.Aesthetic Standards
1.Authority and Scope
i.O.C.G.A. § 32-4-92(a)(10) authorizes the City to establish reasonable regulations for the installation, construction, maintenance, renewal, removal, and relocation of pipes, mains, conduits, cables, wires, poles, towers, traffic and other signals, and other equipment, facilities, or appliances in, on, along, over, or under the public roads of the City. Further, 47 U.S.C. § 253(c) provides that the City has authority to manage its public rights of way.
ii.The City finds it is in the best interest of the City and its residents and businesses to establish aesthetic requirements and other specifications and reasonable conditions regarding placement of facilities in the public rights of way. These requirements, specifications and conditions are adopted in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents and businesses of the City and to reasonably manage and protect the public rights of way and its uses in the City.
iii.The objective of Section 342.14(g) is to ensure use of the public rights of way:
1.Is consistent with the design, appearance and other features of nearby land uses;
2.Protects the integrity of historic, cultural and scenic resources; and
3.Does not harm residents’ quality of life.
iv.Section 342.14(g) applies to all requests to locate facilities in the public rights of way and ongoing use of the public rights of way for such facilities. Section 342.14(g) is established pursuant to City Charter and applicable law. Section 342.14(g) is administered by the Department of Planning and Development.
v.Placement or modification of facilities in the public right of way shall comply with this Section at the time the permit for installation or modification is approved and as amended from time to time. Permittees are required to comply with City Code and applicable law and regulations.
2.Facilities Standards
i.Facilities must be compatible in size, mass, and color to similar facilities in the same zoning area, with a goal of minimizing the physical and visual impact on the area.
ii.Facilities in the residential, historical, architecturally significant areas shall be visually and architecturally integrated with the residential, historical, architecturally significant areas and shall not interfere with prominent vistas or significant public view corridors.
iii.Facilities must be located in alignment with existing trees and/or facilities.
iv.Facilities must maintain the integrity and character of the neighborhoods and corridors in which the facilities are located.
3.Undergrounding. Except as provided in Section 342.14(g)(3)and Section 342.14(g)(3)(b), facilities shall be installed underground so long as placement underground will not materially impact the provision of service. Any individual requesting to locate facilities above ground has the burden to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that undergrounding will effectively prohibit the provision of the service in question.
i.Light poles and small wireless facilities collocated thereon may be located above ground in areas of the City where facilities are primarily located underground.
ii.The City may:
1.Allow collocated small wireless facilities placed aboveground prior to the effective date of this Code and subject to any applicable pole attachment agreement to remain above ground; or
2.Allow the wireless provider to replace the pole associated with previously collocated small wireless facilities at the same location or propose an alternate location within 50 feet of the prior location, which the wireless provider shall use unless such alternate location imposes technical limits or significant additional costs.
4.Camouflaging. Facilities must be designed using camouflaging techniques that make them as unobtrusive as possible if:
i.It is not possible or desirable to match the design and color of facilities with similar facilities in the same zoning area, as required under Section 342.14(g)(2)(a); or
ii.Existing facilities in the area are out of character with a streetscape plan or other aesthetic plan that has been adopted by the City.
5.Installation and Modification Standards. Installation of new facilities in, on, along, over, or under the public rights of way or modification of existing facilities in, on, along, over, or under the public rights of way shall:
i.Minimize risks to public safety;
ii.Ensure that placement of facilities on existing structures is within the tolerance of those structures;
iii.Ensure that installations and modifications are subject to periodic review to minimize the intrusion on the right of way;
iv.Ensure that the City bears no risk or liability as a result of the installations or modifications; and
v.Ensure that use of the public rights of way does not inconvenience the public, interfere with the primary uses of the public rights of way, or hinder the ability of the City or other government entities to improve, modify, relocate, abandon, or vacate the right of way or any portion thereof, or to cause the improvement, modification, relocation, vacation, or abandonment of facilities in the right of way.
6.Plans for Use. No facilities shall be placed in, on, along, over, or under the public rights of way unless:
i.There are immediate plans to use the proposed facility; or
ii.There is a contract with another party that has immediate plans to use the proposed facility.
7.Contact Information. Every facility placed in the public rights of way shall at all times display signage that accurately identifies the facility owner and provides the facility owner’s unique site number and also provides a local or toll-free telephone number to contact the facility owner’s operations center.