LandCode
AtlantaCharter and Related Laws — Part I

Chapter 8 — The Office of the Inspector General

current as of 2026-05-29currency checked manuallyOfficialVerify with City of Atlanta9 sections · full chapter
§ 8-101

The Office of the Inspector General.

(a)Establishment. There is hereby established the Office of the Inspector General of the City of Atlanta. The Office of the Inspector General shall consist of the following divisions:
(1)The Compliance Division; and
(2)The Independent Procurement Review Division.
(b)Purposes. The purposes of this Article shall be to provide for an orderly and fair process to reasonably ensure that the city, and its officials and employees are complying with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and internal policies and procedures; to provide and enforce standards of practice related to the performance and financial operations of the city; and for investigating allegations of waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption. Investigations conducted by the Office of the Inspector General are administrative in nature.
(c)The Office of the Inspector General shall be led by the Inspector General of the City of Atlanta who shall be responsible for the coordination of the efforts of the divisions of the Office of the Inspector General.
(d)Funding.
(1)The Atlanta City Council shall provide funds necessary for the facilities, equipment, and staffing of the Office of the Inspector General to carry out the responsibilities specified herein and by ordinance.
(2)Funding provided by the Atlanta City Council for the Office of the Inspector General made pursuant to this section, shall include specific funding for each division of the Office of the Inspector General, which shall include specific fund-*Editor’s note—Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, adopted Feb. 17, 2025, amended the title of Art. 8 to read as herein set out. The former Art. 8 title pertained to the Office of the Inspector General and the Ethics Office.

ing for the Inspector General / Compliance Division and for the Independent Procurement Review Division.

(3)For appropriations to each division within the Office of the Inspector General, the Inspector General shall, within the context of authority over the funds appropriated to the center designated for the division, have authority to draw against and transfer among accounts with such center in conformity with the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances and administrative provisions, with the exception of salaries and benefits accounts. During any fiscal year appropriations for salaries and benefits shall only be expended as compensation and benefits for employees of the respective divisions within the Office of the Inspector General and are restricted from transfer to any other account. All other expenditures within the center shall be charged against the appropriate expense account in the city's chart of accounts.
(e)Access to records and property; rights and responsibilities; duty to cooperate.
(1)Except where confidential and/or privileged as recognized by state law, all city officials and employees shall allow the Office of the Inspector General access pursuant to this subsection, to any and all public records and property in the custody of the City of Atlanta, including but not limited to books, records, documents, and automated data. All city officials and employees shall also allow the Office of the Inspector General access pursuant to this subsection to personnel, processes (including meetings) and other requested public information, pertaining to the business of the city and within the custody of the City of Atlanta regarding powers, duties, activities, organization, property, financial transactions, contracts, and methods of business, which have been determined by the Office of the Inspector General to be required to conduct an investigation. In addition, except where confidential and/or privileged as recognized by state law, such officials and employees shall provide access for the Inspector General, pursuant to an investigation, to inspect all property, equipment, and facilities within their custody. The provision of public records in the custody of the City of Atlanta pursuant to this section shall be done pursuant to applicable City of Atlanta internal processes and procedures without undue delay in accordance with this section. The provision of property in the custody of the City of Atlanta pursuant to this section shall be pursuant to the following:
a.The Office of the Inspector General should first request that the employee or city contractor in possession of the property sought voluntarily surrender the property. This request should be in writing, specifying the property needed. This request shall include citation to any relevant laws, regulations, or policies that give the Office of the Inspector General the authority to seize or review the City-owned property as part of the investigation. This includes ensuring that the Office of the Inspector General has the jurisdiction to access such property and any related data. Should any applicable City of Atlanta internal processes and procedures cause delay in the surrender of property, such processes or procedures shall be communicated to the Office of the Inspector General in writing, and such communication shall detail the internal process or procedure causing the delay and shall provide an estimated date by which the property shall be surrendered.
b.Should there be a refusal to voluntarily surrender the property, the Office of the Inspector General may proceed with the issuance of a subpoena for such property in accordance with the requirements of this section.
c.Upon the seizure of City property, the Office of the Inspector General shall maintain a clear chain of custody for all seized property, documenting the time, date, and the person who handled the property at each stage to maintain the integrity of the evidence.
d.If necessary, the Office of the Inspector General pursuant to an investigation, shall engage the Department of Atlanta Information Management or utilize digital forensic software or other technology to properly extract data from devices to preserve the integrity of the evidence without tampering.
(2)The provision of personal property in the custody of City of Atlanta officials and/or employees can only be sought if there is a clear, legitimate reason to believe that they contain evidence relevant to an investigation such as where public records are stored on personal electronic devices. The access to personal property shall only be obtained pursuant to the following procedures:
a.The Office of the Inspector General should first request that the employee or city contractor in possession of the personal property sought voluntarily surrender the personal property or the relevant information contained therein. This request should be in writing detailing the reason for the investigation and specifying the personal property needed and the nature of the information such as emails, text messages, or files sought. This request shall include citation to any relevant laws, regulations, or policies that give the Office of the Inspector General the authority to seize or review the personally owned devices as part of the investigation.
b.Should there be a refusal to voluntarily surrender the personal property, the Office of the Inspector General may proceed with the issuance of a subpoena for such personal property in accordance with the requirements of this section.
c.Upon the seizure of personal property, the Office of the Inspector General shall maintain a clear chain of custody for all seized property, documenting the time, date, and person who handled the property at each stage to maintain the integrity of the evidence.
d.If necessary, the Office of the Inspector General shall engage the Department of Atlanta Information Management or utilize digital forensic software or other technology to properly extract data from devices to preserve the integrity of the evidence without tampering.
e.Efforts should be made to copy or mirror any personal property, computer, cell phones or other electronic devices, such that the inconvenience to the owner of the personal property is minimized.
(3)In the event any city official or employee shall fail to allow access to any requested public records and property in the custody of the City of Atlanta as required in this section, the Inspector General shall have the power to compel the production of said public records or property in the custody of the City of Atlanta by subpoena. The Municipal Court of Atlanta, upon written motion made promptly and in any event before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance therewith may either:
a.Quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive; or
b.Condition denial of the motion upon the advancement by the Inspector General of the reasonable cost of producing the evidence.
c.Uphold the validity of the subpoena and compel release or access to the property.

If any person duly subpoenaed shall fail to allow access to said public records and property, the Inspector General shall report such failure to the Municipal Court of Atlanta or judge thereof, who may make such order as shall be proper for the production of any such documents and things, or the person may be cited and punished for contempt by the Municipal Court.

(4)All contracts with outside contractors, vendors and agencies shall include an inspections clause to provide access for the Office of the Inspector General to all records, and those of their subcontractors, needed to verify compliance with the terms specified in the contract. No member of the Office of the Inspector General shall participate in any activity, decision or meeting that would impair independence.
(5)In addition to as specifically provided in this section, in furtherance of an investigation pursuant to this Article, the Inspector General may issue subpoenas to compel the production of documents and things including for books, records, documents, papers, automated data, and other written instruments. Subpoenas issued to third parties in possession of financial data, medical information, or telecommunications activity information, must be approved by a judge of the Municipal Court of Atlanta prior to issuance. Additionally, upon issuance, pursuant to Georgia law, the person or entity whose information is sought from the thirdparty must be given a copy of the subpoena simultaneously with its issuance to give the person or entity whose information is sought an opportunity to contest the validity of the subpoena pursuant to a motion to quash before the disclosure of the records to the Office of the Inspector General. The Municipal Court of Atlanta, upon written motion made promptly and in any event before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance therewith may either:
a.Quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive; or
b.Condition denial of the motion upon the advancement by the Inspector General of the reasonable cost of producing the evidence.
c.Uphold the validity of the subpoena and compel release or access to the requested records.

If any person duly subpoenaed shall fail to allow access to said records and property, the Inspector General shall report such failure to the Municipal Court of Atlanta or judge thereof, who may make such order as shall be proper for the production of any such documents and things, or the person may be cited and punished for contempt by the Municipal Court.

(6)Records and property subject to disclosure under this section which state law recognizes as confidential and/or privileged shall be exempt from disclosure to the Office of the Inspector General or subpoena issued under this section.
(7)The Office of the Inspector General shall not publicly disclose any information received during an investigation that is considered confidential by any local, state, or federal law or regulation.
(8)Rights and responsibilities.
a.The Office of the Inspector General may inform the subjects of the investigation prior to the time of their interview, if any, and subjects of an investigation shall have the right to have representation of their choice from a union or an attorney during any interviews by the Office of the Inspector General. If the subject desires an attorney, the city attorney may select and appoint an outside counsel to represent the subject.
b.Employees should be fully informed of their rights and responsibilities when interacting with the Office of the Inspector General and be provided clear written notice thereof prior to any interview.
c.Employee interviews shall only be conducted during an employee's assigned working hours and shall only be conducted in City facilities unless a different time or location, including but not limited to the home of the employee, is mutually agreed upon by the employee and the Office of the Inspector General.
d.The Office of the Inspector General is expressly prohibited from the use of any covert surveillance technology during the conduct of any investigation conducted thereby.
(9)In addition to the obligations described in this subsection, it shall be the duty of every city official or employees, and officials and employees of city outside contractors, vendors and agencies to cooperate with the Office of the Inspector General regarding any investigation initiated pursuant to this Article by answering questions and/or making sworn statements concerning an investigation initiated pursuant to this Article when directed to do so by a duly appointed representative of the Office of the Inspector General. Officials and employees will provide all relevant information and answer all questions honestly, completely, and to the best of their ability. An official or employee's refusal to cooperate and provide sworn statements, answers, as required by this subsection shall be considered a violation in accordance with this section.
(f)Violations.
(1)Intentionally furnishing false or misleading information to the Office of the Inspector General shall subject the violator to any one or more of the following:
a.Administrative sanction of not more than $1,000.00 assessed by the Office of the Inspector General;
b.Public reprimand by the Office of the Inspector General; and
c.Prosecution by the city solicitor in municipal court for a violation of this section, and, upon conviction, to a fine of up to $1,000.00 per violation and up to six months imprisonment in accordance with section 1-8, whether the official or employee is elected or appointed, paid or unpaid. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to conflict with state law. An action for violation under this subsection shall be commenced within two years after the violation in accordance with section 1-9.
(2)With regard to violations by City of Atlanta employees, in addition to the remedies articulated in this subsection, the Office of the Inspector General may recommend any one or more of the disciplinary actions set forth in section 114-502. Where such employees are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General as set forth in this Article, such recommendations shall be furnished to the appointing authority of the subject employee.
(3)With regard to violations by persons other than officials or employees, in addition to the remedies in this section, the Office of the Inspector General may recommend to the Chief Procurement Officer any one or more of the following:
a.Suspension of a contractor; and
b.Disqualification or debarment from contracting or subcontracting with the city.
(g)Protection for reporting of violations. Officials and employees are encouraged to report suspected misconduct to the Office of the Inspector General. No official or employee shall use or threaten to use any official authority or influence to discourage, restrain or interfere with any other person for the purpose of preventing such person from acting in good faith to report or otherwise bring to the attention of the Office of the Inspector General information relating to a violation or investigation under this Article. No official or employee shall use or threaten to use any official authority or influence in order to affect any action as a reprisal against an official or employee who reports, initiates a complaint, or otherwise brings to the attention of the Office of the Inspector General, information relating to a violation or investigation under this Article.
(1)A city official or employee, or officials or employees of city outside contractors, vendors and agencies, who believes that they have been subject to action in violation of this subsection may report an allegation of such action to the Office of the Inspector General, which shall conduct an investigation into such an allegation.
(2)Within 30 days of its receipt of an allegation made in accordance with this subsection, the Office of the Inspector General shall provide written notice to the individual having made such an allegation, that the allegation has been received by the Office of the Inspector General and the name of the individual in the Office of the Inspector General who shall serve as the point of contact with the individual having made the allegation.
(3)At the conclusion of an investigation conducted pursuant to this subsection, the Office of the Inspector General shall issue a final decision and report in accordance with this section. Violations of this subsection shall be subject to action provided in this section in addition to any remedies available under federal or state law.
(h)Upon request of the Governing Board for the Office of Inspector General, the city attorney, shall provide legal counsel to the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General. Any attorney(s) assigned to provide legal counsel to the Office of the Inspector General shall be subject to internal measures adopted by the Department of Law to ensure confidentiality of information gained while advising the Office of the Inspector General and that there shall be no conflicts under Rule 1.7 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct.
(i)City political activities, prohibited.
(1)The Inspector General shall not engage in city electoral political activities and may not make campaign contributions to candidates in city elections during their terms. A violation of this subsection shall constitute cause for removal of as described in this Article.
(2)No employee of the Office of the Inspector General shall perform work, either in a paid or unpaid capacity, for any candidate for City elected office.
(Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-102

Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General.

(a)To ensure the independence of the Office of the Inspector General, the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General is hereby established.
(b)The Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall have the powers and duties as provided in this Article.
(c)The position of a member of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall be deemed vacated:
(1)Upon the expiration of his or her term, except that any member of the Governing Board serving an expired term may continue to serve until they are reappointed or until a successor is appointed;
(2)Upon the death of a member or the disability or incapacity of a member for more than 90 days;
(3)Upon the written resignation of the member, tendered to the Board;
(4)Upon removal of the member for good cause by a majority vote of the Board. Good cause may consist of, but is not limited to, sharing confidential information regarding investigations, using information gleaned from investigations for personal gain, or to influence investigations, and/or a failure to otherwise fulfill their duties as a member of the Board.
(d)Members shall be prohibited from engaging in city electoral political activities and from making campaign contributions to candidates in city elections during their terms as Board members. Violations of this subsection may be punished by removal from Board membership by a majority vote of the members.
(e)Unless otherwise specified, the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General:
(1)Elect a chair, who must be an attorney and who must have no less than five years of investigative experience, by majority vote of the serving members. Each chair will serve a two-year term and shall be eligible to serve as chair in successive years.
(2)Elect a vice-chair to preside in the absence of the chair. The vice-chair will serve a one-year term and shall be eligible to serve as vice-chair in successive years.
(3)Hold regular meetings at City Hall. Such meetings shall be televised. All meetings of the Board shall be conducted as required by the Georgia Open Meetings Act.
(4)Conduct its business only with a quorum. A majority of the members of the Governing Board shall constitute a quorum. The affirmative vote of a majority of the members shall be required for the transaction of business, except as otherwise provided by this Article. In no event shall a decision of the Board be voted upon by fewer than 4 members.
(5)The Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall be free to contract for the services of a competent court reporter to take down statements, testimony and discussions at its meeting or to use in lieu thereof a competent person adept at shorthand reporting and/or mechanical transcribing devices, whichever method is from time to time desired by the Board, such services to be paid for by the city.
(f)The city shall pay all administrative costs, including those specifically stipulated in this Article, pertaining to the operation of the Board.
(g)No member of the Board present at a meeting of a quorum of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall abstain from voting for any reason other than a publicly disclosed conflict of interest.
(h)The Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General may establish its own bylaws. Except as otherwise provided in this Article, or as set forth in duly adopted bylaws, the meetings of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order. (Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-103

Functions of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General; appeal hearings.

In addition to the functions described in this Article, the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall:

(a)Hear all appeals that may be filed from any adverse decision or report issued by the Office of the Inspector General, pursuant to this Article. Appeals must be filed within 14 days of receipt of the adverse decision. In no way shall the ability to appeal an adverse decision of the Office of the Inspector General issued pursuant to this Article constitute the establishment of a property interest in any employee's employment with the City. Any such property interest shall only be established pursuant to Chapter 114.
(b)Subpoena; authority of Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General.
(1)Issuance, contents, service. Whenever the attendance of any witness may be required before the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General to establish any fact in connection with any hearing which may be lawfully conducted by the Governing Board, the Governing Board is authorized to, by majority vote, issue a subpoena, directed to the witness, requiring the witness to personally be and appear at the time and place of the hearing conducted by the Board and to produce at that time and place any documentary evidence which, in the judgment of the Board, may be required. Such witness shall remain in attendance at the hearing until excused therefrom. The subpoena shall be issued in the name of the city shall be signed by the presiding member of the Board. Service of a hearing subpoena issued by the Board in accordance with this subsection shall be issued at least 24 hours before the time such witness is required to attend and shall continue in effect until the attendance of the witness.
(2)Penalty for violation. If any person so summoned as set out in part (1) of subsection (b) of this section as a witness shall fail, neglect or refuse to attend the hearing or shall fail, neglect or refuse to produce any relevant documentary evidence or shall fail or refuse to take and subscribe to the required oath or affirmation or shall fail to answer any question lawfully propounded or shall fail to continue in attendance until excused by the Board, the person shall be cited to appear before the municipal court and, upon conviction, to punishment as provided in section 1-8.
(c)During all hearings before the Board, formal legal rules of evidence shall not be strictly applied. Evidence may be admitted if it is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs. The Board shall follow the Georgia rules of evidence regarding privileges.
(d)Any decisions of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General on an appeal filed in accordance with this section shall be either to affirm or overturn the decision of the Office of the Inspector General; and shall be issued in writing by the member of the Board presiding over the hearing, shall be issued in writing within 15 days from the close of the evidence. The Board shall use "the preponderance of the evidence" as the standard of proof for all decisions. The decision shall be transmitted to the parties or their representatives. The Board's decision shall be final, and there shall be no right to any additional administrative appeals.
(e)Final decisions of the Board against a party subject to an investigation may be appealed via a petition for review pursuant to the Superior and State Court Appellate Practice Act at OCGA Sec. 5-3-1, et seq.
(Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-104

The Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General; appointments; terms.

(a)The Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General shall consist of seven members, all of whom shall be known for their personal integrity. Nominees shall either be residents of the city, shall be employed within the city, or shall maintain business interests within the city. It is further urged that the members of the Board shall reflect the diversity of the city with regard to race, color, creed, religion, gender, marital status, parental status, familial status, sexual orientation, national origin, gender identity, age and disability to the extent possible. At all times, at least three members shall be attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia or an inspector general or an equivalent position within a corporation.
(b)Appointments to the Board shall be made as follows and said appointments shall be confirmed by the city council and approved by the mayor:
(1)The Atlanta Bar Association may nominate one member;
(2)The Gate City Bar Association may nominate one member;
(3)The Atlanta Business League may nominate one member, chosen from the organizations that are members of the league;
(4)The Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce may nominate one member from the organizations that are members of the chamber;
(5)The Atlanta-Fulton County League of Women Voters may nominate one member;
(6)The Atlanta Planning Advisory Board may nominate one member, which member shall not be an officer of a neighborhood planning unit; and
(7)The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners may nominate one member, chosen from the members of the association.
(c)The members shall each serve for terms of three years. The members shall elect a chairperson, who shall be an attorney with no less than five years of investigative experience, from among the members.
(d)Appointees shall be subject to an education and employment background check, a criminal history check. Appointees shall execute all forms and releases necessary for the department of personnel and human resources and the department of police to accomplish the same. If the appointee is determined to have committed a felony, the proposed appointment shall be withdrawn. (Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-105

Inspector General of the City of Atlanta.

(a)Appointment; term; removal. There shall be an Inspector General of the City of Atlanta who shall be appointed for a term of five years by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General, subject to confirmation by a majority of the council and approval by the mayor. The removal of the Inspector General before the expiration of the designated term shall be for cause by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the Governing Board.
(b)Qualifications. The Inspector General of the City of Atlanta shall, within eighteen months of the approval of their appointment, be an active member of the State Bar of Georgia in good standing and shall have at least ten years of experience in the active practice of law and at least five years of investigatory experience.
(c)In addition to leading the Office of the Inspector General, the Inspector General of the City of Atlanta shall:
(1)Serve as the director of the Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General; and shall, in accordance with this Article, be responsible for the administration and direction of the affairs and operations of the Compliance Division, and shall exercise general management and control thereof; and
(2)Serve as the director of the Independent Procurement Review Division of the Office of the Inspector General; and shall, in accordance with this Article, be responsible for the administration and direction of the affairs and operations of the Independent Procurement Review Division, and shall exercise general management and control thereof; and
(3)Be responsible for maintaining records of the Office of the Inspector General.
(d)The Inspector General of the City of Atlanta, as the head of the Office of the Inspector General, shall:
(1)Be deemed to be the appointing authority within the context of Chapter 114 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances, regarding actions concerning any of the deputies, assistants, employees and personnel assigned to the Compliance Division; and
(2)Be deemed to be the appointing authority within the context of Chapter 114 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances, regarding actions concerning any of the deputies, assistance, employees and personnel assigned to the Independent Procurement Review Division.
(e)Pursuant to Chapter 114 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances and within the budget approval process and established personnel policies for all departments, neither the members of the council, the president of the council, nor the mayor shall in any manner attempt to influence or dictate the appointment or removal of any such official or employee whom the Inspector General is empowered to appoint.
(f)The Inspector General and any deputies, assistants, employees and personnel of the Office of the Inspector General shall be members of the unclassified service of the City and shall not engage in the private practice of law.
(g)The Inspector General shall report to the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General; and notwithstanding-any provision of this Article to the contrary, the Governing Board shall act as the appointing authority within the context of Chapter 114 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances regarding actions concerning the Inspector General.
(h)Reporting Responsibilities. The Inspector General's responsibilities to the Governing Board shall include but shall not be limited to the following:
(1)Providing the Governing Board with written copies of the Standard Operating Procedures and policies of the Office of the Inspector General, including but not limited to investigative policies and procedures for approval of the same for approval by the Governing Board
(2)Issuing quarterly public reports to the Governing Board to ensure transparency and accountability. These quarterly reports shall be considered public records and should include summaries of investigations, recommendations for corrective actions, outcomes (without disclosing sensitive or confidential information), and any difficulties or problems that the Office of the Inspector General may have encountered.
(3)Submitting the Office of the Inspector General to peer reviews to be conducted by professionals from similar agencies and coordinated by the Governing Board no fewer than once every four years in order to assess the quality, fairness, and adherence to professional standards of the work of the Office of the Inspector General.
(4)Providing an annual report, after approval by the Governing Board, to the mayor, and the city council each January of the area(s) of greatest concern on which the Inspector General proposes to conduct training during the upcoming calendar year.
(Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-106

Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General.

(a)Jurisdiction. Subject to the requirements concerning the initiation and conduct of investigations contained in this Article, the Inspector General, as the director of the Compliance Division, shall have the non-exclusive jurisdiction to investigate and take appropriate action regarding:
(1)The performance and financial operation of all departments, offices, boards, activities and agencies of the city as referred by the City Auditor upon determination that perceived deficiencies discovered during the City Auditor's official duties indicate the presence of waste, fraud, or abuse;
(2)Matters under the purview of Independent Procurement Review Division upon determination by the Inspector General that perceived deficiencies discovered during such review indicate the presence of waste, fraud or abuse;
(3)Complaints regarding allegations of waste, fraud, or abuse by departments, offices, boards, activities and agencies of the city which the Inspector General determines independently to be appropriately supported by reasonable articulable suspicion, or properly referred, as outlined in this Article; and
(4)Complaints regarding allegations of abuse of authority in the exercise of official duties or while acting under color of office, substantial misconduct, (such as gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, or a substantial violation of law, ordinance, or regulation), or conduct that undermines the independence or integrity reasonably expected of an official or employee against the following classes of officials and employees:
a.Elected officials;
b.Employees appointed or hired directly by an elected official;
c.Members of any city boards, authorities, commissions, etc. having city representation, whether created or appointed to by the city, and any employees thereof; and
d.Hearing officers.

The jurisdiction of the Compliance Division shall not include allegations of violations solely of the City Code of Ethics/ Standards of Conduct. Any complaints alleging such ethical violations shall be referred to the Ethics Officer.

(b)Pursuant to the requirements of this Article, the Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General shall have the authority to initiate and conduct investigations in accordance with clear Investigation Protocols to be developed by the Inspector General and approved by the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General. These protocols shall ensure that all investigations follow a consistent process, which includes defining the scope, objectives, and timeline of the investigation. Investigations may be initiated:
(1)Upon a sworn written complaint by any person in a form prescribed by the Office of the Inspector General, and which can be supported by the Office of the Inspector General through a showing of reasonable articulable suspicion;
(2)Upon internal determination by the Office of the Inspector General, supported by reasonable articulable suspicion, that a matter under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Compliance Division concerning waste, fraud, abuse, or corruption set forth in this Article has occurred or is occurring;
(3)Upon request via Resolution by the Atlanta City Council;
(4)Upon request by the Mayor of the City of Atlanta via administrative order;
(5)Upon request of the Chief Transparency Officer;
(6)Upon the determination by the City Auditor of the presence of indications of fraud, or abuse are present as a result of an audit conducted in accordance with Section 2-603 of the City of Atlanta Charter;
(7)Upon receipt of an anonymous or nonsworn written complaint. Where a complaint is communicated anonymously, such complaint shall be reasonably believed to have been made in good faith, and with veracity and sufficient specificity so as to provide salient and investigable facts which can be supported by the Office of the Inspector General through a showing of reasonable articulable suspicion. The Office of the Inspector General may require the anonymous complaint to be made in a manner and form that is intended only to obtain relevant facts related to the allegation, and that is not designed to reveal the identity of the complainant; or
(8)Upon receipt of a complaint via complaint intake system managed by the Inspector General pursuant to this Article.
(c)All written complaints shall contain the following if applicable:
(1)The name and address of the person or persons who file the complaint.
(2)The sworn verification and signature of the complainant.
(3)The name and address of the party or parties against whom the complaint is filed, and if such party is a candidate and the office being sought.
(4)A clear and concise statement of acts upon which the complaint is based along with an allegation that such facts constitute one or more violations of law under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Inspector General.
(5)Any further information which might support the allegations in the complaint including, but not limited to, the following:
a.The name and address of all other persons who have firsthand knowledge of the facts alleged in the complaint; and
b.Any documentary evidence that supports the facts alleged in the complaint.
(d)Defective complaint. Upon receipt of a written, non-anonymous complaint which does not conform to the applicable requirements of this section, the Office of the Inspector General shall by written communication acknowledge receipt of the complaint and advise the complainant of the defect in the complaint and that the complaint may not be considered unless the defect is corrected.
(e)Preliminary Review of Investigations. Upon receipt of a complaint and/or the initiation of an investigation in accordance with this Article, the complaint or investigation shall be assigned an intake number. To ensure that resources are utilized effectively, investigations are targeted and justified, and to avoid the conduct of unwar-ranted inquiries, within a period not to exceed 90 days following the initiation of an investigation by the Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General, the Office of the Inspector General must conduct a preliminary review of facts which must reasonably indicate the suspected misconduct or wrongdoing. A determination that facts are present which reasonably indicate the probable occurrence of suspected misconduct or wrongdoing must be supported by credible evidence, a documented complaint, or specific and verifiable information. If, within 90 days of the initiation of an investigation, the Office of the Inspector General determines that the facts do not reasonably indicate the probable occurrence of suspected misconduct or wrongdoing, the investigation should be closed and the subjects and witnesses involved provided written notice of the closure.
(f)Opportunity for Response. To protect against erroneous, arbitrary or adverse decisions, where the preliminary findings indicate, the Office of the Inspector General shall issue an adverse decision or report, the subject of such an adverse decision, including any individuals, employees, officials, office or department of city government, or other entity shall be presented with a summary of the preliminary adverse findings and given the opportunity to respond to preliminary findings within 10 working days of the presentation of such findings.
(1)Response options. The response may be made in writing or in person or both. If the response is made in person, a video and/or audio recording of the response shall be made and transcribed, and such records shall be included in the investigation file.
(2)Supporting documentation. The subject may submit statements or supporting documentation from persons having knowledge of the circumstances to support the response.
(3)Representative. If the subject chooses to meet with the Office of the Inspector General, the subject may be accompanied by a representative or attorney.
(4)Further official investigation. The Office of the Inspector General may conduct further investigation, provided that the Office of the Inspector General determines that additional time is necessary for further investigation and provided that the two year limitation for initiation of an investigation has not lapsed.
(g)Issuance of Final Decisions and Reports. At the conclusion of any investigation conducted by the Compliance Division of the Office of the Inspector General, the Inspector General shall issue a final decision and report.
(1)Requirements of final decision and report. As part of the final decision and report, the report shall include findings of fact and any law on which the decision is based, separately stated, and the effective date of the decision. Findings of fact shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the findings. Where possible, names of witnesses and persons other than the subject(s) of the investigation should not be contained in the final decision and report.
(2)Transmittal and Referral of final decision and report. The Inspector General shall provide the final decision and report to the Governing Board of the Office of the Inspector General. The Governing Board shall then transmit the final decision and report to the mayor, the city council and to the public. Should the final decision and report contain a finding of fraud, waste, or abuse, the Governing Board may refer the matter to the appropriate law enforcement agency for further investigation if the Governing Board shall determine such a referral to be appropriate. The Governing Board shall also cause closing letters to be transmitted to the subject(s) of investigations once an investigation is concluded, informing them of the findings and any follow-up actions within 30 days of the closure of the investigation.
(h)Duties and Responsibilities. The duties of the Inspector General as the director of the Compliance Division shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1)Educating and training employees and officials in matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division as approved by the Atlanta City Council pursuant to this Article;
(2)Investigating allegations against and recommending specific disciplinary, punitive, or other adverse action, authorized by this division or chapter 114 of the City Code of Ordinances, to be taken against the classes of officials and employees under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division as specified in this Article;
(3)Forwarding allegations, reports, and factual determinations regarding violations of laws, rules, regulations, and internal policies related to matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division to the disciplinary/appointing authority of any officials or employees not under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division for action in accordance with chapter 114 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances;
(4)Conducting investigations into matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division referred by the Ethics Officer, the Mayor, the Atlanta City Council, and the City Auditor;
(5)Managing a complaint intake system; and monitoring, evaluating and acting upon information obtained therefrom which shall include, but shall not be limited to a city telephone number for the receipt of information about violations of matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division, or by an employee of the city pursuant to section 3-508 of the City Charter. Each complaint, as of the time it is reported, whether by telephone or otherwise, shall be deemed to be a separate pending investigation of a complaint against a public official or employee as provided by the Georgia Open Records Act;
(6)Urging compliance with laws, rules, regulations, and internal policies related to matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division by investigating any failure to comply or the furnishing of false or misleading information;
(7)Notifying the subject of a report of the completion of an investigation into any alleged violation of a law, rule, regulation, or internal policy related to matters under the jurisdiction of the Compliance Division;
(8)Reporting, as appropriate, suspected criminal violations of a law, rule, regulation, or internal policy related to a matter under the Compliance Division to the local, state or federal law enforcement agency with proper jurisdiction; and
(9)Issuing reports which provide recommended standards of practice to the applicable departments, offices, and boards of city government following a determination by the City Auditor of deficiencies.
(Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23; Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 1, 2-17-25)
§ 8-107

Independent Procurement Review Division of the Office of the Inspector General.

(a)Jurisdiction. The Inspector General, as the director of the Independent Procurement Review Division, shall manage the function of Independent Procurement Review. The Review shall not opine regarding the procurement process but shall provide an Independent Procurement Review Report to the council that the contract file is complete or shall note areas of perceived deficiencies.
(b)Duties and Responsibilities. The duties of the Inspector General as the director of the Independent Procurement Review Division shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1)Performing independent reviews on solicitations of any value including retroactive procurements and emergency procurements; and
(2)Observing all stages of the procurement process as provided in this Charter and the code.
(c)The Inspector General and the Independent Procurement Review Division shall be provided all documents and resources by the chief procurement officer, or their designee, needed to complete any independent review.
(d)The Inspector General, as the director of the Independent Procurement Review Division shall provide notice to Council of any extensions or cancellations of solicitations or discretionary reviews that they conduct.
(e)Review of Contracts with an Aggregate Value of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) or greater.
(1)For solicitations with an aggregate value of $1,000,000.00 or greater seeking council authorization pursuant to sections 2-1188, 2-1189, 2-1191, 2-1191.1, or 2-1193 of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances, the Independent Procurement Review Division shall review all procurement records, as provided in section 2-1108 of the City of Atlanta Code, and conduct a conflict verification of each proponent responding to solicitations.
(2)Following the review conducted in accordance with this subsection, an Independent Procurement Review Report shall be issued which shall include the tracking of procurement procedures, based on known risks, from the inception of the solicitation to the end.
(3)The Independent Procurement Review Report shall be included with all authorizing legislation recommending the awarding of a contract for all contracts seeking council authorization. The council shall not approve legislation for contracts as described in this subsection without first having received the complete Independent Procurement Review Report.
(4)No contract subject to this section shall be awarded unless the review process set forth herein have been fully completed.
(Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23)
§ 8-108

Reserved.

Editor’s note—Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 2, adopted Feb. 17, 2025, repealed § 8-108, which pertained to the ethics officer and derived from Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23.

§ 8-109

Reserved.

Editor’s note—Ord. No. 2025-06(25-O-1009), § 2, adopted Feb. 17, 2025, repealed § 8-109, which pertained to the ethics office and derived from Ord. No. 2020-09(19-O-1729), § 1, 2-6-20; Ord. No. 2023-14(22-O-1823), § 1, 4-26-23.

ARTICLE 9. THE ETHICS OFFICE